Sunday, September 22, 2013


Michael Jackson's Death - The Truth Revealed (MUST SEE)

Source Article:
Singer, songwriter, and sister to the late pop icon Michael Jackson says, “They killed him”.

By Shepard Ambellas
September 21, 2013
CALIFORNIA — After the bombshell report by Avalon hit the press earlier this week, there has been a new era of suspense surrounding Michael Jackson’s death.

The report detailed how a Dept. of Defense (DoD) whistleblower came forth, posting a demand video on YouTube which gives the DoD until Monday, to come clean on information pertaining to Michael Jackson’s death.

In the video the whistleblower plays what sounds like an audio recording of Michael Jackson on the phone with another person. The whistleblower claims the audio was taken one day before Jackson’s death. A transcript of the recording reads:

“I don’t know if I should tell you this. I don’t know who may be listening. There may be a group of people…they want to get rid of me. I can’t talk about it over the phone. I don’t know what’s going to happen, I just feel…in my soul. Only God knows. They could shoot me, they could stab me, they could frame me and say I overdosed on drugs. They can do a lot of things. It’s not the government. It’s more than the government. But I don’t know, I don’t care about my life anymore, I just want my children to be okay, my little angels. I want them to be safe.”[1]

Now some are eagerly awaiting the report on Monday, as a follow-up to the whistleblowers demands and promise.

Michael Jackson’s sister La Toya Jackson, has said on various occasions and even to the press that “they” killed the famous pop star. She also has stated how Michael was controlled. ”People controlled him, they controlled him. They did what they wanted. It was very difficult for him to say no, no.” La Toya said in a TV interview, going on to say, “This way they have him and they control everything he does, the phones, there’s no phones in the house”.

Link to this page
Why were there no phones in the house?

Deeper research shows that Michael’s security team requested that there be no phones at his residence, an odd request indeed.

In another sit-down interview La Toya stated, “You have to remember that Michael told me repeatedly they were going to kill him, that he was going to die” [...] “The doctor that you are looking at there is the fall guy”. La Toya obviously knows more than she has said in previous interviews. Right now is reaching out to La Toya to she is she is ready to talk.

“They murdered my brother, and they know who they are” – La Toya Jackson."


Photo by Sean Getts

Behold the blatant re-writing of American history and the mass mind-control that is under way in American schools. Notice that two separate schools, in two different states (Texas and South Carolina) are using the exact same deceptive wording about the 2nd Amendment to twist the minds of children and normalize the existence of a police state.

To hell with public schools!!!! Please protect your children! Don't allow them to attend institutions of mind-control! There is no real education happening in the schools!

Source Article:
Update: High School AP History Book Rewrites 2nd Amendment[583065735066180]&action_type_map=[%22og.likes%22]&action_ref_map

"It is our duty to stop stuff like this.

Guyer High School (and obviously several others) are complicit in attempting to condition students to interpret the 2nd Amendment in a clearly opposite manner in which it was intended. The 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 5th are also misinterpreted as several commenters below pointed out.

This textbook, currently being used by Guyer High School, is attempting to redefine the Second Amendment to impressionable young minds. Parents, you must speak up and demand action. Investigate your child's history book ASAP, and post more pictures in the comments below. Call your school and demand that revisionist history books like this are removed from the school district.

Textbook version: "The people have a right to keep and bear arms in a state militia."

Actual 2nd Amendment: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Did you catch the sleight of hand?

A militia is a body of citizens enrolled for military service, and called out periodically for drill but serving full time only in emergencies. It's a common man army of citizens, NOT soldiers. The citizens are called up in emergencies to protect the free State.

The 2nd Amendment says that a militia is necessary to protect a free State, so in order to be able to have a militia, the citizens have a natural right to keep and bear arms and the government cannot infringe on that right.

The textbook version implies that we're only allowed to keep and bear arms if we're in a State militia, a clear misrepresentation of the 2nd Amendment.

Your Call to Action:

1. Call Guyer High School and tell the appropriate person something like the following:

"Hello, my name is _______________. I saw that your AP History course has issued a book titled, United States History: Preparing for the Advanced Placement Examination. In this book, on page 102, the definition provided for the Second Amendment is incorrect and seems to be suggesting that only members of a State Militia are allowed to keep and bear arms. Who made the decision to use this text book? I'd like them to issue a public statement on this book's attempt to redefine the 2nd Amendment and why they chose to use it. We would also like this issue to be discussed at the next school board meeting. Please include it on the official agenda."

John H. Guyer High School
7501 Teasley Lane
Denton, TX 76210
P: 940-369-1000

2. If you live in the area or if you child attends this school, organize with your neighbors and storm the next school board meeting to demand answers.

School Board Meeting

Tuesday, September 24, 2013 6:00 PM

The Denton ISD Board of Trustees will be meeting at 6 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 24, in the Board Room at the Dennis Stephens Central Services Building. For more information please contact Kim Stevenson, administrative assistant to the superintedent, at (940) 369-0002.

3. Inspect your child's history book and photograph other instances of intentional misrepresentations. Post pictures and blog about these occurrences. Demand your school districts regain control of their curriculum.

4. Share this story with your friends, family, and media connections to raise awareness.


Just got off the phone with Kim Stevenson, Admin to the Superintendent.

1. Board members will not address any speaking on an item that is not part of the official agenda.

2. A community member could not add an item to the agenda.

3. You must sign in at Kim's desk in order to speak. You can speak up to 2 times and for 3 minutes. If a large number of us are attending we can assign a person to be our spokesperson and they may possibly give that person extra time.

The state adopts the textbooks every couple of years. She advised that besides attending next week's board meeting that we also speak with Darrell Muncy, Director of Student Services or speak with someone in the curriculum department.

UPDATE from Sean Getts, the father who took the picture:

"I had no idea that a pic I posted on FB would spread like wildfire. 99.99999999% of the people probably don't even know that it was my 16 year old daughter that actually brought it to my attention. I certainly planned on taking action, but the attention its received nationally has been incredible.""

Even though the following story was recounted by parents, I am posting so that all can see that the exact same 2nd amendment quote from a Texas school (above) is being taught in a South Carolina school too!

The mind-control and blatant lies are extensive folks!!! Keep your kids away from schools. There is no real education happening there.

Source Article:
Exclusive: School Teaches Students it’s Constitutional for Cops to Confiscate Guns

"South Carolina parents were furious this week after seeing questions regarding the Constitution – in particular the Second Amendment – as taught in their daughter’s 8th grade history class. The daughter’s teacher had given the class a pop quiz regarding the Constitution. Question 10 asked, “Mr. Jones’ gun was confiscated at a police traffic stop, even though he had the proper permit and license of ownership of the gun. Is this Constitutional?” The student originally answered “no,” but the teacher told daughter to change her answer to “yes.” See picture below.

This is not a unique event. Just this week, another report emerged in Texas of an Advanced Placement (AP) textbook presenting a modified version of the Second Amendment. The textbook’s wording indicated that only police and military were allowed to have guns with the wording “The people have the right to keep and bear arms in a state militia.”

AP textbooks and exams are created by the College Board, an organization which has participated in the implementation of Common Core, the already-invasive and controversial set of education “standards” organized for the Federal Government and pushed on states with financial incentives and a lack of transparency. People have already found disturbing lessons in the program, such as teaching children to argue on an emotional level to manipulate people into accepting social change.

This educational push for the modification of the Second Amendment comes at the time of an intense and multifaceted, nationwide battle over gun rights. This battle, prompted by the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Connecticut, has been fought in both the legislative and cultural spheres. Attorney General Eric Holder, however, was the first to indicate it should be brought into the educational sphere when he said people should be “brainwashed” about guns.

“I’ve also asked the school board to make a part of every day some kind of anti-violence, anti-gun message,” he said in a video released in March 2012. He went on to say “It’s not enough to have a catchy ad on a Monday and then only do it every Monday. We need to do this every day of the week and really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.”

Eric Holder -- We Need to Brainwash People Into Thinking About Guns in a Vastly Different Way

Bias in education has been in the spotlight multiple times since 2008. It’s clear that there is a nationwide push to change the understanding of the Second Amendment in the next generation. Now parents are concerned that the school systems are being used to push a leftist agenda instead of educating students with the skills needed to excel in their careers."

Saturday, September 14, 2013


Source Article:
And now it's global COOLING! Record return of Arctic ice cap as it grows by 60% in a year

"A chilly Arctic summer has left nearly a million more square miles of ocean covered with ice than at the same time last year – an increase of 60 per cent.

The rebound from 2012’s record low comes six years after the BBC reported that global warming would leave the Arctic ice-free in summer by 2013.

Instead, days before the annual autumn re-freeze is due to begin, an unbroken ice sheet more than half the size of Europe already stretches from the Canadian islands to Russia’s northern shores.
global cooling

The Northwest Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific has remained blocked by pack-ice all year. More than 20 yachts that had planned to sail it have been left ice-bound and a cruise ship attempting the route was forced to turn back.

Some eminent scientists now believe the world is heading for a period of cooling that will not end until the middle of this century – a process that would expose computer forecasts of imminent catastrophic warming as dangerously misleading.

The disclosure comes 11 months after The Mail on Sunday triggered intense political and scientific debate by revealing that global warming has ‘paused’ since the beginning of 1997 – an event that the computer models used by climate experts failed to predict.

In March, this newspaper further revealed that temperatures are about to drop below the level that the models forecast with ‘90 per cent certainty’.

The pause – which has now been accepted as real by every major climate research centre – is important, because the models’ predictions of ever-increasing global temperatures have made many of the world’s economies divert billions of pounds into ‘green’ measures to counter climate change.

Those predictions now appear gravely flawed.

Only six years ago, the BBC reported that the Arctic would be ice-free in summer by 2013, citing a scientist in the US who claimed this was a ‘conservative’ forecast. Perhaps it was their confidence that led more than 20 yachts to try to sail the Northwest Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific this summer. As of last week, all these vessels were stuck in the ice, some at the eastern end of the passage in Prince Regent Inlet, others further west at Cape Bathurst.

Shipping experts said the only way these vessels were likely to be freed was by the icebreakers of the Canadian coastguard. According to the official Canadian government website, the Northwest Passage has remained ice-bound and impassable all summer.

The BBC’s 2007 report quoted scientist Professor Wieslaw Maslowski, who based his views on super-computer models and the fact that ‘we use a high-resolution regional model for the Arctic Ocean and sea ice’.

He was confident his results were ‘much more realistic’ than other projections, which ‘underestimate the amount of heat delivered to the sea ice’. Also quoted was Cambridge University expert

Professor Peter Wadhams. He backed Professor Maslowski, saying his model was ‘more efficient’ than others because it ‘takes account of processes that happen internally in the ice’.

He added: ‘This is not a cycle; not just a fluctuation. In the end, it will all just melt away quite suddenly.’

The continuing furore caused by The Mail on Sunday’s revelations – which will now be amplified by the return of the Arctic ice sheet – has forced the UN’s climate change body to hold a crisis meeting.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was due in October to start publishing its Fifth Assessment Report – a huge three-volume study issued every six or seven years. It will now hold a pre-summit in Stockholm later this month.

Leaked documents show that governments which support and finance the IPCC are demanding more than 1,500 changes to the report’s ‘summary for policymakers’. They say its current draft does not properly explain the pause.

At the heart of the row lie two questions: the extent to which temperatures will rise with carbon dioxide levels, as well as how much of the warming over the past 150 years – so far, just 0.8C – is down to human greenhouse gas emissions and how much is due to natural variability.

In its draft report, the IPCC says it is ‘95 per cent confident’ that global warming has been caused by humans – up from 90 per cent in 2007.

This claim is already hotly disputed. US climate expert Professor Judith Curry said last night: ‘In fact, the uncertainty is getting bigger. It’s now clear the models are way too sensitive to carbon dioxide. I cannot see any basis for the IPCC increasing its confidence level.’

She pointed to long-term cycles in ocean temperature, which have a huge influence on climate and suggest the world may be approaching a period similar to that from 1965 to 1975, when there was a clear cooling trend. This led some scientists at the time to forecast an imminent ice age.

Professor Anastasios Tsonis, of the University of Wisconsin, was one of the first to investigate the ocean cycles. He said: ‘We are already in a cooling trend, which I think will continue for the next 15 years at least. There is no doubt the warming of the 1980s and 1990s has stopped.

‘The IPCC claims its models show a pause of 15 years can be expected. But that means that after only a very few years more, they will have to admit they are wrong.’

Others are more cautious. Dr Ed Hawkins, of Reading University, drew the graph published by The Mail on Sunday in March showing how far world temperatures have diverged from computer predictions. He admitted the cycles may have caused some of the recorded warming, but insisted that natural variability alone could not explain all of the temperature rise over the past 150 years.

Nonetheless, the belief that summer Arctic ice is about to disappear remains an IPCC tenet, frequently flung in the face of critics who point to the pause.

Yet there is mounting evidence that Arctic ice levels are cyclical. Data uncovered by climate historians show that there was a massive melt in the 1920s and 1930s, followed by intense re-freezes that ended only in 1979 – the year the IPCC says that shrinking began.

Professor Curry said the ice’s behaviour over the next five years would be crucial, both for understanding the climate and for future policy. ‘Arctic sea ice is the indicator to watch,’ she said."


Please listen to this very important interview.

"Survival expert and health guru, Blake Sawyer, argued that the United States will no longer be a viable place to live, and people should consider immigrating to locations in the less populated Southern Hemisphere. Whether through war, disease, famine, natural disasters, or ruthless government, he predicted that 95% of those who remain in the US will be dead in the next 5-15 years. America has been targeted by the "globalists" to be taken out, he added.

Sawyer noted that the United States ranks highest in violent crime, and that countries in the Southern Hemisphere are much more tranquil. In particular, he highlighted nations in the southern region of South America as being good choices for survivability, specifically Chile, Uruguay, Argentina, and Ecuador. "I...believe that the average American does not know that they're the frog in cold water, and they think they're OK, and they're now boiling," he declared."

95% Of Americans Will Be Dead in the Next 5-15 Years


Source Article:
Did you know ??? – for new parents or parents-to-be


1. By forcing, coercing, convincing, threatening and all manner of intimidation etc. Mothers and Fathers to REGISTER their children, YOU are, in FACT, AIDING AND ABETTING all Mothers and Fathers into FRAUD via theirs and your ignorance of the SLAVERY SYSTEM of the CROWN CORPORATION and are GUILTY as such?

2. That once a child is REGISTERED, the CHILD, by association with that REGISTERED NAME, is assumed and presumed a BOND DEBTOR/SLAVE and is LEGALLY OWNED by the CROWN CORPORATION if that child ever uses that NAME in acts of COMMERCE/IDENTIFICATION?

3. That because you are, in FACT, also using a CROWN COPYRIGHTED NAME, LEGALLY REGISTERED as such, YOU have “UNCLEAN HANDS” and are GUILTY of FRAUD by using, affixing, claiming etc. a NAME you BELIEVE to be yours when, in FACT, it isn’t and never was yours to use AFTER it was REGISTERED by YOUR parents?

4. Every REGISTRATION FRAUD you commit knowingly/unknowingly makes you GUILTY of ENTICEMENT INTO SLAVERY, AIDING AND ABETTING ANOTHER INTO FRAUD etc. and renders an innocent child a DEBTSERVANT/BONDSMAN/SLAVE for the rest of their lives or until this FRAUDULENT ACT is reversed?

5. By claiming YOUR NAME as yours you are GUILTY of FALSE IMPERSONATION and even more so if you claim any/all TITLES/OFFICES (MR./MRS./CLERK/HEAD NURSE/REGISTRAR etc.) with any/all IDENTIFICATION that creates JOINDER with the NAME you do NOT own/have any rights to?

6. Any/All use of IDENTIFICATION created from the BIRTH CERTIFICATE renders any/all users of that CROWN COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY/NAME guilty of FRAUD/FALSE IMPERSONATION from the instant that NAME is REGISTERED until DEATH/FRAUD REVEALED?


8. That YOU, are inflicting a lifetime of SERVITUDE upon all children/people YOU REGISTER whereupon a BOND is created, typically in the range of ONE MILLION dollars, creating the DEBT against the life and PERFORMANCE (BOND) of the one that is REGISTERED and whereupon ALL MONEY is thereby created?

9. You are an enabler of a SLAVE SYSTEM OF HUMANITY and are GUILTY with every child you REGISTER (to rule, divine feminine creation translated) whereupon the true G.I.F.T. (Gamete Intra-Fallopian Transfer) given up is the very life essence of the one being REGISTERED where the GUILT is maximized with any/all coercion, intimidation, threats, deception etc. YOU attempt to enforce REGISTRATION against any/all beings who do not wish to REGISTER their children?

Look in the mirror and see the criminal that you are, whether you knew this or not but now that you do, you have a choice. You can continue to commit these CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY for some filthy lucre called money upon which a souls’ value is placed or you can begin to heal these FRAUDS VIA DECEPTIONS by waking up to this very real situation. You, and all people with REGISTERED NAMES are PROPERTY OF THE CROWN CORPORATION/BONDSERVANT/SERVITUDE SLAVE and it would be in the interest of all parties concerned with the exception of any/all TEMPLE BAR MEMBERS (BRITISH ACCREDITED REGISTRY) AGENTS OF THE CITY OF LONDON, STATE who are the ones that created and profit from the SERVITUDE of a system they created and YOU AID AND ABET the FRAUDS to uphold it. You can research these facts for yourself because I know you will find it difficult to comprehend the magnitude of your crimes every time you REGISTER a child. As a first step, go and try to procure ANY/ALL GOVERNMENT IDENTIFICATION without a BIRTH CERTIFICATE. Typically, a passport is the best start whereupon all other forms of IDENTIFICATION need a GOVERNMENT ISSUED I.D. Given that the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is NOT to be used for identification purposes and is, in fact, a CRIME to do so, you may begin here to ask yourself why? For further information on this please feel free to visit my website and pop by the “kate’s writings” page. Now you know and are fully obligated to act upon truth because to do otherwise only proves your fraudulent programmed nature. Have a nice day!"


Source Article:
Ingenious 19-year-old Develops Plan to Clean up Oceans in 5 Years

With millions of tons of garbage dumped into the oceans annually and repeat incidence of oil spills like the Deepwater Horizon Disaster, it’s the Ocean which has taken the brunt of unsustainable methods from man. In effect, it’s estimated almost 100,000 marine animals are killed due to debris entanglement and continually rising pollution.

To a degree, individual lessening of consumerism and utilizing sustainable methods to re-use and eliminate waste is very beneficial. However, reducing the already-toxic state of the Earth is the biggest concern of environmentalists and engineers, seeking to utilize the technological advances already available. To this avail, it was 19-year-young Boyan Slat that ingeniously created the Ocean Array Plan, a project that could remove 7,250,000 tons of plastic from the world’s oceans in just five years.

Slat’s idea consists of an anchored network of floating booms and processing platforms that could be dispatched to garbage patches around the world. Working with the flow of nature, his solution to the problematic shifting of trash is to have the array span the radius of a garbage patch, acting as a giant funnel as the ocean moves through it. The angle of the booms would force plastic in the direction of the platforms, where it would be separated from smaller forms, such as plankton, and be filtered and stored for recycling. The issue of by-catches, killing life forms in the procedure of cleaning trash, can be virtually eliminated by using booms instead of nets and it will result in a larger areas covered. Because of trash’s density compared to larger sea animals, the use of booms will allow creatures to swim under the booms unaffected, reducing wildlife death substantially.

Economically, the Ocean Array Project also rises to the top due to its sustainable construct; it’s completely self-supportive, by receiving energy from the sun, currents, and waves. By also letting the platforms’ wings sway like an actual manta ray, contact with inlets in the roughest weather can be ensured. It’s a plan that merges environmental safety with thoroughly thought out processes.

Inspired to tackle global issues of sustainability, Boyan began by launching a project at school that analyzed the size and amount of plastic particles in the ocean’s garbage patches; his final paper went on to win several prizes, including Best Technical Design 2012 at the Delft University of Technology. Continuing the development of his concept during the summer of 2012, he revealed it several months later at TEDxDelft2012.

Slat took his well-planned project further by then founding The Ocean Cleanup Foundation, a non-profit organization responsible for the development of proposed technologies. Aside from saving thousands of animals and reducing chemicals (like PCB and DDT) from building up in the food chain, it could also save millions of dollars a year due to clean-up costs, lost tourism, and damage to marine vessels. His undeterred passion to create healthier oceans has possibility to beneficially impact the lives of the entire world.

Although extensive feasibility studies are currently being conducted, it has been estimated that through the selling of plastic retrieved over the five years, the money would surpass the initial cost to execute the project. In other words, it may even be potentially profitable. Because the main deterrent to implement large scale cleanup projects is due to the financial cost, this solution could perhaps pave ways for future innovations of global cleanup to also be invented.

While the project process would take five years, it’s a span that could continue to increase the world’s awareness of garbage patches, as well as the importance of recycling and reducing consumption of plastic packaging. To find out more about the project and to contribute, click here."

Tuesday, September 3, 2013


Another baby sacrificed on the altar of modern medicine, and the evil ones try to turn the tables by blaming the parents for this sordid outcome.


Source Article:
Five Month-Old Baby Dies Just Days After 8 Vaccinations – Parents Are Charged With Her Murder - See more at:

"Parents in South Africa are facing life in prison for the murder of their baby girl who died just days after receiving routine vaccinations. Baby A had received all her vaccinations on time. On September 25, 2012, when she was aged just five months, her parents took her to their local clinic, where she received a total of eight vaccinations before being sent home.

Baby A’s mother told VacTruth that the vaccinations were administered extremely harshly, with the nurse appearing to stab their daughter viciously with a variety of needles. Baby A received eight vaccines in total, the five-in-one vaccine Pentaxim said to protect against diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, haemophilus influenza type B (Hib) and polio; the hepatitis B vaccine; the rotavirus vaccine; and a vaccine said to protect babies against pneumocococcal and non-typeable haemophilus influenzae disease, Prenevar/Prenvar.

Her mother explained that after her ordeal, Baby A was irritable, upset and had difficulty in settling. That the following day, she was unable to move her legs, which remained hard and swollen around the injection site for several days.

Amazingly, this was not the first time that Baby A had suffered from this side effect. Her mother told VacTruth that her legs had become swollen after vaccinations before, when they had remained swollen for several weeks. When Baby A’s parents asked the nurses at the clinic why their daughter’s legs were swollen, they were told that it may have been due to the technique that was used at the time of vaccination.

The nurses recorded this reaction on Baby A’s vaccination card and told Baby A’s mother to use a warm face towel and massage her legs. When Baby A suffered the same side effect after vaccinations given on September 25, 2012, Mrs. A immediately used a warm face towel to soothe her daughter’s legs and lessen the swelling.

So, why weren’t the healthcare providers concerned about this reaction?

“She Turned Blue and We Tried to Give Her CPR”

On October 9, 2012, Baby A appeared to be her normal self, playing, kicking and smiling; however, the next day things were very different. Mrs. A explains:

“Baby A woke up and appeared to be crabby and running a high fever. She was only was happy if we were holding her and carrying her. That day, I gave her Panado and was dabbing her with a cool face towel to bring the fever down. At about 15:30 or so I had just finished feeding her and gave her to my husband to burp and as he was burping he heard her gasp for like a breath of air and when I looked at her she had collapsed on his shoulder and wasn’t breathing. She turned blue and we tried to give her CPR but as we were doing that she was throwing up and still was not breathing.

We decided to rush her to the nearest hospital but we were unfortunate as there was traffic at the time and only got there at about 16:00. I could be off a few minutes, we took her into the trauma unit and they took her from us and told us to wait in a separate room. They managed to resuscitate her and put her in the NICU, they then took her to get a CT scan and then said they needed to take x-rays as well.”

After what seemed like forever, the doctor appeared and informed the anxious parents that their daughter had blood on her brain and appeared to have been shaken. He said that the little girl had multiple fractures of the long bones.

When Mr. and Mrs. A asked the doctor what had happened to their daughter, the doctor was abrupt, saying, “I don’t know, I wasn’t there, why don’t you tell me?”

Mrs A. told VacTruth that she felt that his comment was uncalled for and insulting and that she could not understand what he was implying. She said:

“We were so upset, how could he say that? What was he implying? That was our baby there and we didn’t know what had happened.”

She told me that she had turned to the doctor treating Baby A and said to him:

“You are the doctor, you are supposed to help us. All of a sudden everything we had got taken away, our life, our 24 hours a day, we have nothing left to do now but wait for some sort of answer as to why our baby is lying there. I don’t know what this shaken baby syndrome is, no one shook our baby. We were there, that’s not an answer, we need an answer.”
“We Decided to Switch Off the Ventilator”
"Baby A" before being vaccinated.

“Baby A” before being vaccinated.

Sadly, Baby A’s parents never got an answer and three days later, they noticed that their daughter’s hands, feet, head and eyes appeared swollen. Worried, they asked the nurses what was wrong and they were informed that the swelling was due to the lack of oxygen reaching the brain.

Mrs. A said that around this time that the pediatrician requested a biopsy to test the collagen for brittle bone disease. The results of this test are not known because Baby A’s medical records have since gone missing.

The next day the doctor suggested to Baby A’s parents that it might be time to switch off the ventilator. He explained that Baby A was not going to wake up and asked her parents whether they would consider organ donation, which the devastated couple refused on religious grounds.

On the fifth day, the swelling had became much worse and six days after Baby A’s admission into the hospital, hospital staff could no longer open the little girl’s eyes. It was at this stage that Baby A’s parents decided that their precious daughter had suffered enough. Mrs. A explained:

“We decided to switch off the ventilator and let our baby rest in peace, we had a meeting with the nurses and doctors and told them that we would switch off at 7am the following day and the nurses said that there would have to be an autopsy and the pediatrician then said, no, that was not necessary, and the nurses insisted.

Day 7 came [on] October 17, 2012 and as soon as we got there, they took Baby A out of her bed and told us to sit, put her in our arms and switched off the ventilator. They didn’t even give us five minutes alone with her to say goodbye to her.

We then sat alone with her after she had passed on and waited in the waiting area for them to release her body. We waited between two and three hours and they told us they were waiting for the police to come and pick up the body to take it to the morgue to do the autopsy.”
Doctors are Blaming Parents for Vaccine Injuries
"Baby A's" vaccine records.

“Baby A’s” vaccine records.

This is yet another tragic case in which parents have been accused of shaking their baby, after a possible vaccine injury has occurred. Baby A’s vaccination card showed that at the tender age of five months she had received a total of 21 routine vaccinations. This is a vast number of vaccinations and it is becoming evident that many babies of this age cannot tolerate an onslaught of toxins, chemicals and poisons of this magnitude.

It is important to recognize that some parents do physically abuse their children and while I appreciate that this is not acceptable, doctors must appreciate that not every injury is the result of child abuse.

Over recent years, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of parents being accused of shaken baby syndrome after a possible vaccine injury has occurred. In 1998, Dr. Viera Scheibner called this rise an “epidemic.” In a paper published by Nexus, she wrote:

“Some time ago I started getting requests from lawyers or the accused parents themselves for expert reports. A close study of the history of these cases revealed something distinctly sinister: in every single case, the symptoms appeared shortly after the baby’s vaccinations.” [1]

I would go one step further than Dr. Scheibner and say that this epidemic has now become a “pandemic of shaken baby syndrome.”

Baby A’s vaccine card states that on the September 25 she received the Prevanar vaccine, a vaccine that has been known to cause severe adverse reactions, including convulsions, difficulty in breathing, swelling of the face, hands and feet and death. [2]

Could it be possible that the swelling of Baby A’s hands, feet, head and eyes was in fact evidence that she was suffering from an adverse reaction from the vaccine?
More Infant Deaths from this Dangerous Vaccine

Many may argue that this swelling happened two weeks after the vaccine was administered, but I would counter argue, stating that there is no set time frame for an adverse reaction to occur. Remember, Baby A’s legs had swollen up shortly after she received the vaccine and had remained swollen for some weeks.

According to Reuters, in 2009 the Dutch authorities banned the vaccine Prevenar after three infants died within two weeks of receiving the vaccine. This was the same time frame that occurred between the administration of the vaccine and Baby A’s death.

A spokeswomen for the Dutch health institute RIVM stated:

“On average, about five to ten deaths are reported annually after babies get vaccines. We now have three cases in a short period; that is unusual, and the reason for suspending the batch.” [3]

The deaths in Holland are not the only deaths that have been reported.

In 2000, Michael Horwin, MA, reported that while conducting the clinical trials for Prevenar, twelve children had died.

In Part 3 of his paper entitled Prevnar A Critical Review of a New Childhood Vaccine, Horwin wrote:

“Furthermore, the insert tells us that, “Twelve deaths (5 SIDS and 7 with clear alternative cause) occurred among subjects receiving Prevnar.” This number was less than the ’21 deaths (8 SIDS, 12 with clear alternative cause and one SIDS-like death in an older child)’ that occurred in the control group. However, both groups (Prevnar and control) received some form of experimental vaccine. Therefore, all we know is that 33 children are dead and at least 13 died of SIDS.” [4] (emphasis added)

This paperwork also revealed that several doctors involved in the clinical trials were reported to have had conflicts of interest. If this is true, then the efficacy of this vaccine was questionable before it was ever approved and this was borne out by the website ‘Flu Prevention and Treatments – Naturally’ who stated that during a search of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a total of 28,317 adverse reactions had been reported since the vaccine had been approved in 2000 which included:

558 deaths

555 life threatening conditions

238 permanent disabilities

2,584 hospitalizations

101 prolonged hospitalizations

8,166 emergency room cases

16,155 “not serious” [5]


As with so many of these cases, Baby A did not just receive just one vaccine, so it is therefore difficult to pinpoint exactly which vaccine, if any, may have led to her death. However, it is vital that the doctors involved in this case as with all cases, consider the vaccines as a possible contributory factor.

Sadly, these parents have been accused and charged with the murder of their daughter without any substantial evidence of foul play. There appears to be no evidence of external head injuries or bruising to the upper body to indicate that Baby A had been shaken.

I believe that if this child had been shaken there would have been evidence of either back or neck injuries because a baby of five months does not have full head control.

All vaccines and drugs carry a risk of adverse reactions and after receiving 21 vaccines it is highly possible that Baby A died of toxic poisoning. If so, her death was caused not by her parents but by the huge number of vaccines sanctioned by the government and the fact that the hospital failed to recognize the possibility that this little girl may have been suffering an adverse reaction to vaccination.

Editor's Note

Names have been changed for legal purposes.






- See more at:"

Monday, September 2, 2013


Folks -- this is HUGE!!!! You can definitely FEEL the HAND OF GOD in this activity and KNOW that the dark forces are being brought down!

What an incredible time to be alive!!! Thank you Kevin Annett, for all you are and do!

Italian parties to unite with ITCCS, confront Vatican

"The campaign for justice by victims of the Roman Catholic Church took a major step forward this past weekend when two political parties in Italy agreed to meet with ITCCS officials in September.

The meeting will plan what an internal statement calls "a comprehensive political and legal campaign to de-secularize the church and bring it under the rule of law and democratic control".

This campaign will include as its aim the annulment of the so-called Lateran Treaty between Italy and the Vatican which protects the church from prosecution for its crimes against humanity.

Inspired by the August 4 Brussels Declaration of the ITCCS that proclaimed the Roman Catholic Church to be a transnational criminal body under international law, the Italian parties agreed that the time has arrived for "decisive political action in Italy on behalf of all the victims of the papacy". (see, August 3)

The parties in question presently have standing in the Italian Chamber of Deputies and the Senate. Their agreement to engage in unofficial talks with ITCCS representatives, including ITCCS Field Secretary Rev. Kevin Annett, was made on Saturday, August 24 at a joint conference of their respective leadership bodies.

These facts were communicated to the ITCCS Central Office in Brussels that same day through a joint communique signed by spokespeople for the two parties under their pseudonyms "Massimo" and "Maria".

Speaking from Washington D.C. today, Rev. Annett hailed the move as "the break we've all been waiting for".

"Our campaign has always been an inherently political one because of the enormity of the institutional crime we're confronting. So it's gratifying that finally, Italian politicians are taking steps to defang and curtail the power of the Catholic Church as a criminal body – and to not let the money and influence of the Vatican stop them, which has been the case up until now.

"I know their courageous example will not be lost on politicians and governments elsewhere".

For security reasons, the two parties will conduct their September meetings with the ITCCS clandestinely, within Italy and at an undisclosed location in Switzerland.

Meanwhile, the planned convergence of spiritual elders and survivors of church torture on the Vatican on Sunday, September 22 is proceeding with a new vigor.

Entitled "A Global Assembly of Spiritual Reclamation", the equinox event will include simultaneous gatherings, church occupations and "community exorcisms" at Catholic churches in twenty one countries on that same day.

In an August 20 statement issued by Not in Our Name! (Non!), a coalition of Catholic and Protestant clergy based in America that is co-sponsoring the Assembly, it is stated,

"The Vatican has already been legally disestablished and found guilty of abominable crimes in the common law courts of mankind. Now we are spiritually disestablishing that church and creating a new way for Christians to end their legacy of Imperial Christianity, church-protected child rape and genocide. Christ is not the Church.

"This Assembly is a an act of repentance and exorcism, done through the will of God and the least of God's children. Now is the time for all true Christians to leave the false church, and let the dead souls in Rome bury their own dead." *

(* To contact Not in Our Name! write to thecommonland at

Stay tuned for further announcements of these groups and events.

Issued 26 August, 2013 by ITCCS Central Office, Brussels (G. Dufort, Secretary)

itccscentral at"


Wow! If this is true, then things are definitely looking up. And Obomber is going down.

Source Article:
Historical disgrace: the U.S. military mutiny forced Obama to retreat

"U.S. President Barack Obama apparently had to call off the planned military strike against Syria because of a formidable mutiny in the U.S. military leadership. The soldiers could not recognize the President’s strategy – and expressed grave concerns against the action. Never before have America’s soldiers so openly refused to follow a president.

The U.S. military refused to follow U.S. President Barack Obama (shown here with the Chief of General Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen and Defense Secretary Robert Gates in memory of September 11): Obama has gone too far in the fight against terror. His soldiers did not want to go to war which they do not understand. (Photo: White House)
U.S. President Barack Obama’s surprising withdrawal from his Syria plans is apparently due to a massive mutiny in the U.S. Army.

The Washington Post reports that from four-star generals to the ordinary soldiers hardly anyone saw the benefit the military action promoted by Obama.

The Post reports that the soldiers are especially missing a clear strategy of what would happen after the planned military strikes. Many U.S. soldiers have had bad experiences with the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. At first they were promised heroic goals. But no sooner were the interventions in process, the troops were sent into always new adventures. In both cases there was no exit strategy. The announcements to withdraw from the battle zones were contradictory and drawn out in length.

In the case of Syria, Obama did not succeed in convincing the military of the sense of a military operation.

So far, the U.S. military has always been publicly silent and obeyed the orders of the military-political leadership. The bases for most operations were that the president succeeded in convincing the soldiers to believe that the particular mission served the "national security."

Obama also tried to use this concept in Syria’s case.

But his own soldiers did not believe him.

Even more embarrassing for Obama: Most of the officers and soldiers have a much clearer concept of reality than their president and commander in chief.

So said the retired Lieutenant General Gregory S. Newbold in the Post, "The politicians are naive about the obligations that exist in foreign policy. Many are woefully ignorant about what a military operation can achieve." Newbold was in the leading cadres of the Iraq war. He said that many of his active colleagues share his serious concerns.

An officer who would only comment anonymously, said, "I cannot believe that the president even takes this step into consideration. In the past 10 years we have been fighting against insurgents. Syria has advanced weapons systems. We would have to fight in a conventional war."

Already in the past week had Gen. Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, pointed to the headlessness of the Obama administration. He told the ABC, "The simple use of weapons, without a detailed strategy on how the mission will be completed, probably never leads to the conclusion that we imagine."

General James Mattis said, "If the Americans actually perform such an operation, then it will be a brutal, very, very serious war."

Another active officer said, "What political end state do we want to achieve? I do not know what it is. We say it should not be a regime change. If there is to be punishment - there are other ways to punish someone. "

Many military leaders are also uncertain because of the rapid decay of the anti-Syria coalition leads to new tactical planning: Without the British the operation presents itself differently. Nato’s lukewarm support has also caused the military to wonder. Simply relying on France seems to many to be too little. And Turkey is already viewed with suspicion by the U.S. military. President Erdogan is not at all trusted, because by many U.S. elites the AKP is considered an Islamist movement that pursues its own agenda.

The fickleness of Cyprus, which made difficulties at the last minute due to Russia’s pressure, has also required logistical replanning - not even considering the legal ramifications.

Pictures like this are circulating on the Internet. Although it cannot be said whether this is a true soldier: the willingness of U.S. forces to fight is low. (via @ NewsNinja2012))

Other officers criticized the half-heartedness of the operation. The military operation, as planned by Obama, gives the U.S. allies in the Middle East the impression that the Americans do not want to seriously defend their interests in the region. The action would appear as if rockets are fired, just so that something would be done.

In the Post article, experienced officers point to the fact that the risk of a military strike is enormous. Especially when in Syria, as John Kerry unveiled on Sunday, the poison gas sarin is in use, a military strike could have unforeseeable consequences. A cruise missile attack could create be more problems than solve them.

Most active soldiers and military officials said explicitly that nothing is further from them than to back-stab the political leadership.

That much more remarkable is the fact that they speak out at all, and do not simply fall again into the always successfully retrieved reflex of simple patriotism as happened since September 11, 2001.

The war on terror seems to no longer serve as motivation to those who are sent to it into the fire. Most U.S. soldiers cannot make sense out of their political leaders’ geopolitical fights. They obviously have no desire to be sent as world police into increasingly remote regions of the world.

The dissent agrees with the assessment of the American population: Only a small minority favors a military strike.
For Obama, it will now be difficult to convince the Congress. Even the representatives face the action more than skeptical. 200 members have signed a petition against the military use.

On top of that, for Congress the same problem arises that also the soldiers have for their rejection: The defense budget has been dramatically reduced because the U.S. budget has gone through decades of an uncontrolled debt policy, which got out of hand.

The mutiny of the U.S. Army is a first in American history.

However, the pressure on Obama seems to have grown so large in recent days that he finally pulled the ripcord, and he had to call off the imminent military action.

And so we experience a phenomenon that until recently, many could not imagine: The mighty U.S. President declared war on a country. And his own soldiers say, "Imagine: The president says it is war, and nobody goes."


Source Article:
Pit of Despair

"Pitocin – a very useful drug that improved obstetrics and gave us options to help women in ways we weren’t able to before!

Pitocin – a very seductive drug that changed obstetrics, increasing risks to mothers and babies in ways that are often not even taken into consideration.

Both of these statements are true – how can that be? I will do my best to explain this complex issue in a simple and straight forward way. Be warned…much of what you are about to read will probably be new to you because these are the things that aren’t being talked about!

I already did a previous blog post on inducing labor and some of the risks/benefits associated with the decision to induce, so I do not want to rehash that once again. The decision to induce is one thing (and a decision that is not to be taken lightly), but what about once the decision is made?

I’m going to simply focus on Pitocin.

Pitocin is a drug used to induce or augment labors here in the US. It is most often given via IV infusion, although immediately postpartum if an IV isn’t already in place it may be given as an intramuscular injection. It was created for the first time in 1953 and became available just 2 years later. Mothering magazine writes, “A survey by Robbie Davis-Floyd, a cultural anthropologist at the University of Texas, found that 81 percent of women in US hospitals receive Pitocin either to induce or augment their labors.” It has been said that only 3% medically require it.

Pitocin- nicknamed “Pit” (and I’ve even heard “Vitamin P”). Whenever I hear it referred to as Pit (which I have been guilty of myself) the following clip from Princess Bride comes to mind…

I have heard many MANY MANY nurses say things such as “Pitocin is just oxytocin…it has the exact same affect on your body.” While the oxytocin in Pitocin is chemically identical to the oxytocin your body produces, this statement is so not true and makes me want to bang my head against the nearest wall.


While the oxytocin your body produces is chemically identical to the oxytocin contained in Pitocin – the way your body recognizes them and responds to them is very different. We have something called the blood-brain barrier. Simply put, the vast majority of substances that enter our blood stream can not pass into the cerebrospinal fluid. Out bodies are made in a way that protect our brain from all but a select few substances going from the blood into the brain (those few things include oxygen and glucose)

Oxytocin is produced by the brain and affects the brain in its natural form. Pitocin is introduced into the blood stream and does NOT affect the brain.

While not always a reliable source of information, this entry from Wikipedia has enough sources sited that I am very confident of its accuracy. Please see the original website HERE to view sources….

“Oxytocin secreted from the pituitary gland cannot re-enter the brain because of the blood-brain barrier. Instead, the behavioral effects of oxytocin are thought to reflect release from centrally projecting oxytocin neurons, different from those that project to the pituitary gland, or which are collaterals from them. Oxytocin receptors are expressed by neurons in many parts of the brain and spinal cord, including the amygdala, ventromedial hypothalamus, septum, nucleus accumbens and brainstem.

Sexual arousal. Oxytocin injected into the cerebrospinal fluid causes spontaneous erections in rats, reflecting actions in the hypothalamus and spinal cord. Centrally administrated oxytocin receptor antagonists can prevent non contact erections, which is a measure of sexual arousal. Studies using oxytocin antagonists in female rats provide data that oxytocin increases lordosis, indicating an increase in sexual receptivity.

Bonding. In the Prairie Vole, oxytocin released into the brain of the female during sexual activity is important for forming a monogamous pair bond with her sexual partner. Vasopressin appears to have a similar effect in males. Oxytocin has a role in social behaviors in many species, and so it seems likely that it has similar roles in humans.

Maternal behavior. Rat females given oxytocin antagonists after giving birth do not exhibit typical maternal behavior. By contrast, virgin female sheep show maternal behavior towards foreign lambs upon cerebrospinal fluid infusion of oxytocin, which they would not do otherwise. Oxytocin is involved in the initiation of maternal behavior not its maintenance, for example, it is higher in mothers after they interact with unfamiliar children rather than their own.

According to some studies in animals, oxytocin inhibits the development of tolerance to various addictive drugs (opiates, cocaine, alcohol) and reduces withdrawal symptoms.

Preparing fetal neurons for delivery. Crossing the placenta, maternal oxytocin reaches the fetal brain and induces a switch in the action of neurotransmitter GABA from excitatory to inhibitory on fetal cortical neurons. This silences the fetal brain for the period of delivery and reduces its vulnerability to hypoxic damage.

MDMA (ecstasy) may increase feelings of love, empathy and connection to others by stimulating oxytocin activity via activation of serotonin 5-HT1A receptors, if initial studies in animals apply to humans. The anxiolytic Buspar (buspirone) also appears to produce some or all of its effect via 5-HT1A receptor-induced oxytocin stimulation. “

In other words – natural oxytocin is produced by the brain and affects the brain before becoming systemic – Pitocin is never seen by the brain and therefore the brain doesn’t respond to it the same way, releasing the complex cocktail of labor/birth hormones that it does during a naturally occurring labor. It has recently been suggested that due to the blood-brain barrier and the hormonal dance that happens during labor – and due to the recent discoveries of the affect of oxytocin in autistic children – that Pitocin may be a contributing factor to the epidemic autistic rates we are seeing lately.

Another notable difference between Pitocin and our natural oxytocin is the rate in which it’s administered. In the body, during a normal natural labor, oxytocin is released in spurts…ebbing and flowing….up and down….causing contractions, then easing off….released in surges. Pitocin is administered via a steady infusion with a pump. Its levels in the blood remain constant – until the Pitocin is turned up (generally every 15-30 minutes).


So many people are given Pitocin without ever hearing a single risk or side effect other than, “it can cause too strong of contractions…but if it does that we’ll just turn it down or off.”

Lets see what has to say (you have to go to PAGE 3):

“The following adverse reactions have been reported in the mother:

Anaphylactic reaction
Postpartum hemorrhage
Cardiac arrhythmia
Fatal afibrinogenemia
Hypertensive episodes
Premature ventricular contractions
Pelvic hematoma
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Hypertensive episodes
Rupture of the uterus

Excessive dosage or hypersensitivity to the drug may result in uterine hypertonicity, spasm, tetanic contraction, or rupture of the uterus.

The possibility of increased blood loss and afibrinogenemia should be kept in mind when administering the drug.

Severe water intoxication with convulsions and coma has occurred, associated with a slow oxytocin infusion over a 24-hour period. Maternal death due to oxytocin-induced water intoxication has been reported.

The following adverse reactions have been reported in the fetus or neonate:

Due to induced uterine motility:

Premature ventricular contractions and other arrhythmias
Permanent CNS or brain damage
Fetal death
Neonatal seizures have been reported with the use of Pitocin.

Due to use of oxytocin in the mother:

Low Apgar scores at five minutes
Neonatal jaundice
Neonatal retinal hemorrhage”

Now is when you get angry when you realize that you were given this drug without any discussion whatsoever of these side effects and risks.


Chances are that you have never heard this word. Pitocin contains not only a synthetic oxytocin, it also contains 0.5% Chlorobutanol, a chloroform derivative that is in Pitocin as a preservative. While the oxytocin in Pitocin has a VERY short half-life of 1-6 minutes (meaning it’s out of your system within a matter of minutes), Chlorobutanol has a very long half-life (about 10 days!), building up in your system for as long as you are being given this substance and remaining in your body for WEEKS.

According to the article “INACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS: Implications for pregnancy”

“Chlorobutanol crosses the placenta in animals and produces human embriotoxicity. Based on these limited data, systemic preparations containing chlorobutanol should be used with caution during pregnancy. Repeated administration, in particular, should be avoided due to the long terminal half life of chlorobutanol (about 10 days) that may lead to accumulation in the fetus.”

It’s known to affect both maternal blood pressure as well as her heart muscle.

From “Effects of chlorobutanol and bradykinin on myocardial excitation “
“However, chlorobutanol does have direct effects on myocardial cells, acting on the cell membrane and decreasing isometric tension produced by the heart.”

From “The effect of oxytocin on the contractile force of human atrial trabeculae.” – “Chlorobutanol decreased the ability of the heart to contract, while as pure oxytocin had no effect. This explains why maternal blood pressure may decrease and provides impetus to produce oxytocin with another, safer preservative.”

And finally, from an article on Methadone and its effects – “Chlorobutanol or chlorobutanol plus methadone, rather than methadone alone, may be the cause of cardiac toxicity in patients treated with IV methadone. Chlorobutanol has a very long half-life, extending beyond 10 days, and one report showed a serum concentration of 85 mg/mL (0.480 mM) of chlorobutanol in a patient receiving IV morphine preserved with 0.5% chlorobutanol. Furthermore, in a controlled clinical trial that led to the discontinuation of chlorobutanol from heparin, chlorobutanol was found to decrease blood pressure in patients. Chlorobutanol also causes significant negative inotropic effects on human atrial tissue, and this was the postulated cause of the hypotension seen in patients receiving oxytocin preserved with chlorobutanol.”

The thing that really upsets me is this: the study on Chlorobutanol affecting the heart which concludes with a call to find another, safer preservative….was published in 1998. We have known about this problem for at LEAST 12 years. Why is this not big news and why have we not explored other safer preservatives for Pitocin? I told you I’d try and make this issue simple: Money. I wonder how many of the 81% of mothers who have received Pitocin in labor have ever heard of chlorobutanol.


Hopefully by now you understand that Pitocin is NOT “exactly the same as going into labor on your own”, that it affects the body differently, and that there are definite risks to both Pitocin and it’s preservative chlorobutanol – but can you really talk about Pitocin without talking about the list of interventions that are likely to come with it?

Think about this:

Chlorobutanol is known to be an anti-diuretic (meaning it will make you retain water) – this is why on Pitocin’s list of side effects and risks you will see “severe water intoxication with convulsion and coma”. We are going to dilute the Pitocin into IV fluid, ensuring that you get a LOT of fluid into your system along with the Pitocin. (it is commonly mixed with 3-1 or 6-1 in the IV bag) Because the oxytocin in Pitocin doesn’t affect the brain the same way your natural oxytocin does, you are likely to experience much more intense FEELING contractions without the good oxytocin feelings that the brain experiences during a natural labor and therefore it is interpreted much more negatively by your body – in other words, you are much more likely to request an epidural anesthesia. Epidural anesthesia is notorious for dropping your blood pressure (I refer you back to the study on Methadone and that chlorobutanol causes significant decreases in blood pressure). Knowing the propensity for the epidural to drop your blood pressure, our answer to this is to make sure to pump enough fluids into your blood to attempt to compensate and keep your blood pressure stable.

Are you beginning to see a problem here? And we haven’t even touched on the fact that chlorobutanol is easily crossing the placental barrier and can affect the baby for the next two weeks! Or the risk of a cesarean that is increased when we use Pitocin, often due in large part to continuous monitoring of the fetal heart rate that is done while the mother is on Pitocin and that brings with it a 90% false positive rate for detection of fetal distress.

This is such a complex game of Russian roulette that we are playing, and there are a lot more bullets in the gun than we are being told. There are definitely times when we should thank our lucky stars that Pitocin has been created and it has saved moms and babies from undergoing cesareans or from having other complications such as postpartum hemorrhage which is a common cause of DEATH in lesser developed countries…but it is NOT the same thing as just encouraging your body to do it! Rather than fixing the problem of stalled labor by acknowledging the relationship between the mind and body and baby and working within it’s natural balance, we resort to trying to put a bandaid on it and don’t even stop to ask what kinds of problems covering the wound might cause.

My solution? Start by recognizing that our bodies are much more complex than we are acting like they are. Recognize that labor and birth is a whole body experience, not just a uterine experience. Treat the cause of the stalled labor, not just the uterus, and give this mom and baby ample time to both start and complete this process. Making her feel safe, nurtured, secure, able to be vulnerable and relaxed and free….carries a heck of a lot less risks than Pitocin does."


Source Article:
Antidepressants Linked to Postpartum Hemorrhage

"How serious an issue is this? The conclusion of this study makes it quite clear: “In an accompanying editorial, Eibert Heerdink, PhD, associate professor of clinical pharmacoepidemiology at the Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Science in the Netherlands, described the study as “especially well-designed” and echoed the investigators’ observation that although the absolute increase in risk is small, it is cause for concern.

“With reported incidences of 2.1 to 8% of all births, Dr. Heerdink notes that postpartum hemorrhage is not an uncommon complication of childbirth and is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity.

“He points out that “even a modest increase of a relatively high baseline risk may have a considerable impact on public health. Pregnant women and their healthcare providers should be aware of the possible risk associate with the use of antidepressants shortly before delivery.”

The SSRI and SNRI antidepressants not only put babies at risk for serious and potentially fatal birth defects, but also endanger the mother’s life as well. Please take heed. Patients as well as physicians need to be warned. See the article below with links to the full study.

Ann Blake Tracy, Executive Director,
International Coalition for Drug Awareness &
Author: *”Prozac: Panacea or Pandora? – Our Serotonin Nightmare – The Complete Truth of the Full Impact of Antidepressants Upon Us & Our World” & Withdrawal CD “Help! I Can’t Get Off My Antidepressant!”

Antidepressant use by pregnant women around the time of delivery is linked to an increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage, new research shows.

A large study of pregnant women diagnosed with a mood or anxiety disorder and conducted by investigators at Harvard School of Public Health in Boston showed about a1.5-fold increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage associated with all classes of antidepressants and not just selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs)."

“Our study suggests that all classes of antidepressants are associated with an increased risk of abnormal bleeding,” the investigators write.

“This study is the first to report an association between exposure to antidepressants at the time of delivery and risk of postpartum hemorrhage in a US population and in a population with a diagnosis of depression,” they add.

With first author Kristin Palmsten, the study was published online August 21 in the BMJ.

A Leading Cause of Maternal Mortality, Morbidity

A leading cause of maternal mortality in the United States, postpartum hemorrhage is also a leading contributor of severe maternal morbidity, blood transfusion, and intensive care admissions.

Some studies have shown a link between bleeding risk — including gastrointestinal bleeding and perioperative bleeding — and antidepressants that inhibit serotonin reuptake.

However, to date, there have been 2 studies — one in Canada and the other in Sweden — that have examined the association between antidepressants and postpartum hemorrhage.

Although these studies raise concerns, the investigators note they had “limitations including potential confounding by mood disorders or factors associated with them, exposure windows that did not focus on delivery, and limited power to assess specific antidepressants.”

To assess the link between exposure to antidepressants at or around the time of delivery and postpartum hemorrhage, the researchers used nationwide Medicaid data.

The study included 106,000 pregnant women aged 12 to 55 years with a diagnosis of mood or anxiety disorder. Women were categorized into 4 exposure groups according to pharmacy dispensing data:

Current exposure: Women with a supply of antidepressants that overlapped with the delivery date

Recent exposure: Women with a supply of antidepressants on at least 1 day in the month before the delivery date but not on the delivery date

Past exposure: Women with a supply of antidepressants ending between 5 and 1 months before delivery

Unexposed: Women who had no supply of antidepressants in the 5 months before delivery, who served as the reference group

SRIs are believed to increase bleeding risk by depleting platelet serotonin. For the study, the investigators classified antidepressants with serotonin transporter Kd 0-9.9 nM as SRIs; those with Kd = 10 nM were classified as non-SRIs. The analysis included only women on antidepressant monotherapy.

The study’s main outcome measures included risk for postpartum hemorrhage by timing of exposure and by SRI or non-SRI, classes of antidepressant, and antidepressant types.

Be Aware of the Risk

The results revealed there were 12,710 women (12%) with current exposure to SRI monotherapy and 1495 women (1.4%) with current exposure to non-SRI monotherapy.

For women with mood/anxiety disorders but no exposure to antidepressants, the risk for postpartum hemorrhage was 2.8%; for current users of SRIs, 4.0%; for current users of non-SRIs, 3.8%; for past users of SRIs, 2.5%; and for past users of non-SRIs, 3.4%.

Compared with the reference group, women with current exposure to SRI monotherapy had a 1.47-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33 – 1.62) increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage. Current use of non-SRI monotherapy was associated with a 1.39-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.07 – 1.81).

“In this population of pregnant women, use of serotonin or non-serotonin reuptake inhibitors at the time of delivery was associated with about a 1.4 to 1.5-fold increase in risk of postpartum hemorrhage and 1.0% to 1.3% excess risk,” the investigators write.

They add that any exposure to antidepressants in the month before delivery was associated with about a 1.2-fold increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage.

Further, exposure to SRIs 1 to 5 months before delivery was not associated with postpartum hemorrhage; exposure to non-SRIs during that timeframe was associated with a nearly significant increased risk.

The increased risk for postpartum depression associated with non-SRIs was surprising and requires further study, the researchers note.

“The absolute increase in risk associated with antidepressant exposure in the month before delivery is small, but women and their physicians should be aware of the potential risks when making treatment decisions near the end of pregnancy,” the investigators write.

Cause for Concern

In an accompanying editorial, Eibert Heerdink, PhD, associate professor of clinical pharmacoepidemiology at the Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Science in the Netherlands, described the study as “especially well-designed” and echoed the investigators’ observation that although the absolute increase in risk is small, it is cause for concern.

With reported incidences of 2.1 to 8% of all births, Dr. Heerdink notes that postpartum hemorrhage is not an uncommon complication of childbirth and is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity.

He points out that “even a modest increase of a relatively high baseline risk may have a considerable impact on public health. Pregnant women and their healthcare providers should be aware of the possible risk associate with the use of antidepressants shortly before delivery.”

The authors and Dr. Heerdink report no relevant financial relationships.

BMJ. Published online August 21, 2013. Full article: , Editorial:


Source Article:
“Absolutely Every One” Bluefin Tuna Tested In California Waters Contaminated with Fukushima Radiation

"Washington’s Blog
May 29, 2013

We noted more than a year ago:

The ocean currents head from Japan to the West Coast of the U.S.


Of course, fish don’t necessarily stay still, either. For example, the Telegraph notes that scientists tagged a bluefin tuna and found that it crossed between Japan and the West Coast three times in 600 days.

That might be extreme, but the point is that fish exposed to radiation somewhere out in the ocean might end up in U.S. waters.

And see this.

CNN reports today:

Low levels of radioactive cesium from Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident turned up in fish caught off California in 2011, researchers reported Monday.

The bluefin spawn off Japan, and many migrate across the Pacific Ocean. Tissue samples taken from 15 bluefin caught in August, five months after the meltdowns at Fukushima Daiichi, all contained reactor byproducts cesium-134 and cesium-137 at levels that produced radiation about 3% higher than natural background sources

The Wall Street Journal quotes the studies’ authors:

“The tuna packaged it up and brought it across the world’s largest ocean,” said marine ecologist Daniel Madigan at Stanford University, who led the study team. “We were definitely surprised to see it at all and even more surprised to see it in every one we measured.”


“We found that absolutely every one of them had comparable concentrations of cesium-134 and cesium-137,” said marine biologist Nicholas Fisher at Stony Brook University in New York state, who was part of the study group.

Link to this page

The bad news is that it is only going to get worse.

As Reuters points out:

Unlike some other compounds, radioactive cesium does not quickly sink to the sea bottom but remains dispersed in the water column, from the surface to the ocean floor.

Fish can swim right through it, ingesting it through their gills, by taking in seawater or by eating organisms that have already taken it in ….

As CNN notes:

Neither [of the scientists who tested the fish] thought they were likely to find cesium at all, they said. And since the fish tested were born about a year before the disaster, “This year’s fish are going to be really interesting,” Madigan said.

“There were fish born around the time of the accident, and those are the ones showing up in California right now,” he said. “Those have been, for the most part, swimming around in those contaminated waters their whole lives.”

In other words, the 15 fish tested were only exposed to radiation for a short time. But bluefin arriving in California now will have been exposed to the Fukushima radiation for much longer.

As KGTV San Diego explains:

The real test of how radioactivity affects tuna populations comes this summer when researchers planned to repeat the study with a larger number of samples. Bluefin tuna that journeyed last year were exposed to radiation for about a month. The upcoming travelers have been swimming in radioactive waters for a longer period. How this will affect concentrations of contamination remains to be seen.

One of the studies’ authors told the BBC:

The fish that will be arriving around now, and in the coming months, to California waters may be carrying considerably more radioactivity and if so they may possibly be a public health hazard.

Japanese and U.S. officials – of course – are pretending that the amount of radiation found in the bluefin is safe. But the overwhelming scientific consensus is that there is no safe level of radiation … and radiation consumed and taken into the body is much more dangerous than background radiation."


The first hour after birth is critically important for baby's brain and neurological development and for baby's ability to create healthy, loving bonds throughout life. The cocktail of love hormones that are present for the first hour after birth will never, ever happen again. That is why it is so, so, so important for babies to be placed immediately, skin-to-skin, on their mother's body (or father's body, if mother is unconscious or unable to be present) -- AND TO BE LEFT ALONE FOR AT LEAST ONE HOUR AFTER BIRTH WITHOUT INTERRUPTION. Baby should be able to look freely in its mother's and/or father's eyes, feel and smell their skin, listen to their heartbeat, and ultimately nurse at the breast of its mother. All of these things are ESSENTIAL for healthy bonding and for the neurobiology of love to activate at birth.

Why, then, are hospitals doing exactly the opposite? Why are hospitals doing everything they can to interfere with the mother-child bond by taking baby away from mother and doing all manner of unnecessary, harsh, and mean-spirited protocols to the baby before finally returning the baby to its mother? Why are they putting gunk in the baby's eyes and preventing baby from making eye contact with its parents? Why are they putting a hat on the baby's head so that mom and dad cannot smell baby's pheromones? Why are they swaddling/mummifying the baby in chemical-ridden blankets so that it cannot move and cannot make skin-to-skin contact with it's mother or father? Why do they insist on washing the baby with their toxic soaps and injecting the baby with neurotoxic chemicals -- all of which will only serve to bring harm to the child?

The reason is obvious for those with eyes to see. And for those who are ready to know and see The Truth, please listen here:

Birth Trauma and Humanity's Takeover

After all the suffering, deprivation, and abuse that is inflicted on infants during hospital birth, is it any wonder that so many end up in neonatal intensive care units, where they are further separated from their mothers, and daily subjected to isolation and torturous protocols that ultimately have no benefit?

Dr. Nils Bergman is trying to heal all that by keeping at-risk babies with their mothers (and/or fathers) skin-to-skin, 24 hours a day, without interruption. It is called kangaroo mother care and helps to ensure that a traumatized or premature infant can thrive.

We should not have to think twice about what is the right thing to do. Babies belong with the people who love them. Period.

Dr Nils Bergman - What we can learn from horses


Radiation on the west coast could be TEN TIMES HIGHER THAN IN JAPAN!!! Meanwhile, the Obama Administration recklessly raises permissible levels of nuclear radiation in US water and soil.

Source Article:
West Coast of North America to Be Hit Hard by Fukushima Radiation

"Radiation Levels Will Concentrate in Pockets In Baja California and Other West Coast Locations

An ocean current called the North Pacific Gyre is bringing Japanese radiation to the West Coast of North America:

While many people assume that the ocean will dilute the Fukushima radiation, a previously-secret 1955 U.S. government report concluded that the ocean may not adequately dilute radiation from nuclear accidents, and there could be “pockets” and “streams” of highly-concentrated radiation.

The University of Hawaii’s International Pacific Research Center created a graphic showing the projected dispersion of debris from Japan (see photo at top of this blog).

Last year, scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory and 3 scientists from the GEOMAR Research Center for Marine Geosciences showed that radiation on the West Coast of North America could end up being 10 times higher than in Japan:

After 10 years the concentrations become nearly homogeneous over the whole Pacific, with higher values in the east, extending along the North American coast with a maximum (~1 × 10−4) off Baja California.


With caution given to the various idealizations (unknown actual oceanic state during release, unknown release area, no biological effects included, see section 3.4), the following conclusions may be drawn. (i) Dilution due to swift horizontal and vertical dispersion in the vicinity of the energetic Kuroshio regime leads to a rapid decrease of radioactivity levels during the first 2 years, with a decline of near-surface peak concentrations to values around 10 Bq m−3 (based on a total input of 10 PBq). The strong lateral dispersion, related to the vigorous eddy fields in the mid-latitude western Pacific, appears significantly under-estimated in the non-eddying (0.5°) model version. (ii) The subsequent pace of dilution is strongly reduced, owing to the eastward advection of the main tracer cloud towards the much less energetic areas of the central and eastern North Pacific. (iii) The magnitude of additional peak radioactivity should drop to values comparable to the pre-Fukushima levels after 6–9 years (i.e. total peak concentrations would then have declined below twice pre-Fukushima levels). (iv) By then the tracer cloud will span almost the entire North Pacific, with peak concentrations off the North American coast an order-of-magnitude higher than in the western Pacific.

(“Order-of-magnitude” is a scientific term which means 10 times higher. The “Western Pacific” means Japan’s East Coast.)

And a team of top Chinese scientists has just published a study in the Science China Earth Sciences journal showing that Fukushima nuclear pollution is becoming more concentrated as it approaches the West Coast of the United States, that the plume crosses the ocean in a nearly straight line toward North America, and that it appears to stay together with little dispersion:

On March 30, 2011, the Japan Central News Agency reported the monitored radioactive pollutions that were 4000 times higher than the standard level. Whether or not these nuclear pollutants will be transported to the Pacific-neighboring countries through oceanic circulations becomes a world-wide concern.


The time scale of the nuclear pollutants reaching the west coast of America is 3.2 years if it is estimated using the surface drifting buoys and 3.9 years if it is estimated using the nuclear pollutant particulate tracers.


The half life of cesium-137 is so long that it produces more damage to human. Figure 4 gives the examples of the distribution of the impact strength of Cesium-137 at year 1.5 (panel (a)), year 3.5 (panel (b)), and year 4 (panel (c)).


It is worth noting that due to the current near the shore cannot be well reconstructed by the global ocean reanalysis, some nuclear pollutant particulate tracers may come to rest in near shore area, which may result in additional uncertainty in the estimation of the impact strength.


Since the major transport mechanism of nuclear pollutants for the west coast of America is the Kuroshio-extension currents, after four years, the impact strength of Cesium-137 in the west coast area of America is as high as 4%.


NOW HEAR THIS!!!! The U.S. government has decided to raise the "permissible" levels of nuclear radiation in drinking water and soil. What this means, as described below, is that the "permissible" rate of cancer will now increase from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 23.



Source Article:
Obama Approves Raising Permissible Levels of Nuclear Radiation in Drinking Water. Civilian Cancer Deaths Expected to Skyrocket
Rollback in Nuclear Radiation Cleanup

"Civilian Cancer Deaths Expected to Skyrocket Following Radiological Incidents

by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER)

The White House has given final approval for dramatically raising permissible radioactive levels in drinking water and soil following “radiological incidents,” such as nuclear power-plant accidents and dirty bombs. The final version, slated for Federal Register publication as soon as today, is a win for the nuclear industry which seeks what its proponents call a “new normal” for radiation exposure among the U.S population, according Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

Issued by the Environmental Protection Agency, the radiation guides (called Protective Action Guides or PAGs) allow cleanup many times more lax than anything EPA has ever before accepted. These guides govern evacuations, shelter-in-place orders, food restrictions and other actions following a wide range of “radiological emergencies.” The Obama administration blocked a version of these PAGs from going into effect during its first days in office. The version given approval late last Friday is substantially similar to those proposed under Bush but duck some of the most controversial aspects:

In soil, the PAGs allow long-term public exposure to radiation in amounts as high as 2,000 millirems. This would, in effect, increase a longstanding 1 in 10,000 person cancer rate to a rate of 1 in 23 persons exposed over a 30-year period;

In water, the PAGs punt on an exact new standard and EPA “continues to seek input on this.” But the thrust of the PAGs is to give on-site authorities much greater “flexibility” in setting aside established limits; and

Resolves an internal fight inside EPA between nuclear versus public health specialists in favor of the former. The PAGs are the product of Gina McCarthy, the assistant administrator for air and radiation whose nomination to serve as EPA Administrator is taken up this week by the Senate.

Despite the years-long internal fight, this is the first public official display of these guides. This takes place as Japan grapples with these same issues in the two years following its Fukushima nuclear disaster.

“This is a public health policy only Dr. Strangelove could embrace. If this typifies the environmental leadership we can expect from Ms. McCarthy, then EPA is in for a long, dirty slog,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, noting that the EPA package lacks a cogent rationale, is largely impenetrable and hinges on a series of euphemistic “weasel words.”

“No compelling justification is offered for increasing the cancer deaths of Americans innocently exposed to corporate miscalculations several hundred-fold.”

Reportedly, the PAGs had been approved last fall but their publication was held until after the presidential election. The rationale for timing their release right before McCarthy’s confirmation hearing is unclear.

Since the PAGs guide agency decision-making and do not formally set standards or repeal statutory requirements, such as the Safe Drinking Water Act and Superfund, they will go into full effect following a short public comment period. Nonetheless, the PAGs will likely determine what actions take place on the ground in the days, weeks, months and, in some cases, years following a radiological emergency."