Sunday, April 27, 2014


When your government is mandating vaccines that are specifically made to cause infertility (i.e., FORCED STERILIZATION), parents have basically three choices:

1. Leave the country

2. Stop having children

3. Run for the hills and hide somewhere where you can give birth to your children in peace, having never subjected them to industrialized "prenatal care," violent hospital births, forced registration for birth certificates, and forced sterilization through vaccines.

Which would you choose?

Source Article:
Standing up to the FEDS About Vaccines

"CDC made a mockery of the Nuremberg code's directive that people must have "informed consent" when it refused to answer FOIA questions from a doctor whose son was autistic about the CDC's knowledge about mercury in vaccines and any discussions at the CDC about it.
Baby getting vaccine

(WASHINGTON DC) - While alternative media is exposing so much of what the genocidal Cabal is doing, trying to start more wars, trying to grab land a la Agenda 21, rigging Wall Street, rigging the entire banking system and Comex, and since the Cabal has more in store, including (more) fake pandemics, it seems just the right time to expose their vaccines.

Right now the vaccine debate is erroneously stuck here.

“I never really liked how many vaccinations a baby was getting,” said Anna Popp, an Easthampton librarian who allowed her 5-year-old daughter to get some of the recommended vaccines, but not all, and delayed other vaccinations beyond the age that doctors say is safe. “I just felt, if I could put some of those off until later, I would rather not overburden my child’s system with a bunch of toxic organisms.”

Popp knows that following her own rules on immunization puts her — and many other vaccine skeptics — at odds with the medical establishment. Popp lives in Western Massachusetts, where the percentage of parents choosing not to vaccinate their children is well above the state average. [More, it's rising, and among the most educated of parents.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, among others, have vouched for the safety of today’s vaccine regimen, and insist vaccines are neither toxic at the doses given nor taxing to normal immune systems.

Now, let's get real. Let's get really real. This above view of vaccines is an endless monkey around the mulberry bush, chasing after whether the vaccines are safe, whether or not the diseases are too threatening for people to miss, whether or not one can trust the AAP or CDC.

Good lord, that all misses - the autism, the seizures, even the deaths - it all misses, misses what is going on with vaccines.

The same Pharmaceutical Industry that was experimenting at Auschwitz on how to covertly sterilize whole populations at regular doctors’ appointments have got their winner, today's vaccines. And they are all urged so caringly for the "health for children."

As you read the following, consider the implications of this chemical agent being in every single one of the vaccines mandated to American children by the US government.

#5) On the World Intellectual Property Organization, a patent application for a "fertility impairing" vaccine. The University of Georgia Research Foundation is listed as the patent applicant.

In the description section of the patent application, Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) is listed as a PREFERRED ingredient.

With children exposed from hours afternbirth to 18 years of age to this known “fertility impairing” agent, the Cabal is secretly and most profitably sterilizing all the children in the united States of America. And they have 200 more vaccines in their "pipeline."

Can we add? Can we drop all the others the ions and focus on the US government mandating vaccines that ALL contain a sterilizing agent effective enough to be in a patent for doing impairing fertility. How much impaired fertility means sterile? One dose? 3? 20? Will 69 just about do it?

So, let's see where they have put Polysorbate 80, other than injecting it directly into newborns, infants, toddlers, little children, children, teens...


"A common emulisfier in cosmetics, vaccines and even ice cream, has been proven to damage fertility. by Joanna Karpasea-Jones

"Ice Cream May Not Be As Nice As It Looks

"Polysorbate 80 (also known as tween 80) is a stabilizer used in a wide variety of products including ice cream, milk products, vitamin tablets, lotions and creams and medical products like vaccines and anti-cancer medications.

"It is toxic and should not be eaten, drunk, put on the skin or injected.

"According to Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Volume 95, Number 6, December 2005 , pp. 593-599(7), “it is of current relevance as a ‘hidden’ inductor of anaphylactoid reactions”, and “Polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent for the anaphylactoid reaction of nonimmunologic origin in the patient. Conclusions: Polysorbate 80 is a ubiquitously used solubilizing agent that can cause severe nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions.”

"Put in plain English, polysorbate 80 can affect your immune system and cause severe anaphylactic shock which can kill.

"The study included a pregnant woman who suffered anaphylactic shock after being given a IV drip of multi-vitamins containing polysorbate 80.

"In addition to this, there have been numerous studies which show that the stabilizer causes infertility:

"Gajdova M, Jakubovsky J, Valky J.Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Mar;31(3):183-90. PMID: 8473002.

"Baby female rats were injected with polysorbate 80 at days 4-7 after birth. It accelerated the maturing of the rats and caused changes to the vagina and womb lining, hormonal changes, ovary deformities and degenerative follicles.

"According to the World Intellectual Property Organization, which is part of the United Nations, scientists from the organization are developing vaccines specifically to damage fertility as a method of contraception. A suggested ingredient for the vaccine is tween 80 (polysorbate 80):

“In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin in squalene oil. The aqueous solution glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80.”

"(Fertility Impairing Vaccine And Methods of Use’ This application claims the benefit of U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/070,375, filed January 2,1998, U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/071,406, filed January 15,1998).

"As it is a preferred ingredient, scientists are obviously aware of its ability to cause infertility.

"Polysorbate 80 is in shampoo and bubble bath, and the dairy industry uses it in ice cream to help retain the shape of the ice cream and to prevent it from melting so quickly after it has been removed from a freezer. Perhaps before you visit the ice cream section of your supermarket, you should re-think your purchase.

"More worrying is the new Gardasil cervical cancer vaccine which is being injected into girls aged 9-26.

“Gardasil contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice,” noted Dee Nicholson, National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care.

"It is stated clearly in the manufacturer’s information sheet that comes with the vaccine.

"Make sure you read it before you get a shot, as theoretically it could damage your reproductive health. Women who were vaccinated in pregnancy or very close to conceiving have also suffered miscarriages as a result, according to the USA’s watchdog, Judicial Watch. They uncovered several reports of spontaneous abortions from the FDA after using the Freedom of Information Act to request the information.

"Take charge of what you eat, use or inject to ensure that your body is as fit for pregnancy as possible."

The Cabal (the Western elite who control the US as a shadow government) is in trouble, losing control of the dollar, struggling to start wars at will, not believed by countries around the world and increasingly not by the American people. Vaccines are major funding source, and the Cabel, with Nazi roots, is not intending to let parents decide. They are now seeking a 100% mandate of vaccines. USA Today is their mouthpiece.

No options - not medical, not philosophical, not religious. Goodbye Nuremberg Code that was put in place to stop the original hideous experiments by Pharma under the Nazis, including with vaccines. The Nuremberg code said simply that people must have "informed consent."

CDC made a mockery of "informed" when it refused to answer FOIA questions from a doctor whose son was autistic about the CDC's knowledge about mercury in vaccines and any discussions at the CDC about it. Agencies are supposed to respond in 20 days. After six years of not answering, it took a lawsuit against the CDC to get anything at all from them, . And the outcome - the CDC Has Known All Along How Dangerous Vaccines Are - And Has Covered It Up.

They lied about mercury and autism.

But what the CDC is hiding and completely successfully about what the vaccines are doing is bigger.

With 69 exposures to the PREFERRED ingredient in a patent for a vaccine for impairing fertility, we can all add. It's way past time that we did.

Today alone, how many newborn baby girls' vaginas and womb linings are being damaged, their hormones changed, their ovary deformed, their teeny follicles degenerated, on the very day of their birth? Welcome to the world, little girl, your future as mother and grandmother, and you yourself, as a future for your parents, has just faced a chemical attack. Welcome to the world little boys, whose hormones have been changed and whose future wives, in hospital bassinetts themselves, are being stripped of their innate capacity to give birth to your future children, your stake in the future.

What a glorious day ...l for an industry beyond evil. Each day, tiny new humans made defunct.

There is nothing to show the HEP B vaccine is effective in infants. And it's a fact that the US government concedes Hep B vaccine causes systemic Lupus Erythematosus

But those, as horrific as they are, are MINOR compared to what the vaccine does do to that little girl. It corrodes her sexual organs. Or what it does to that little boy, wrecking the perfection of his hormones.

What if they escape serious harm somehow? Then, let's add. 1 + 1+ 1 and all the way up to 69 vaccines and let us recognize that the CDC's mandated vaccines will relentlessly expose each little one's tiny organs and hormones to a known sterilizing agent.

Can we add that up?

The CDC is ordering the mass sterilization of US children, beginning on the day of birth.

Yes, the vaccines have been maiming (contributing to autism, seizures, wrecked immune systems), causing infant deaths hidden by SIDS and SUID, and there have been endless lies, to say nothing of the usual corrupt (even bankers) financial tie-ins, such as to Murdoch, the Rockefellers and Goldman Sachs?

But sterilizing children is in a class all on its own. One might argue (thought none too easily) argue the other impacts are accidental even if intentionally hidden, or that corruption is part of everything.

But one can't slip past this. The government is mandating exposing children to a sterilizing agent over and over and over and over against, from birth to 18. (And it's in the flu shot as well, which is linked to a 700% increase in miscarriages, since it slams a girl or woman's sexual organs and hormones, needed to maintain a pregnancy. It's also in the shots being newly mandated for college students, too.)

And with rising parental refusal to let their children be vaccinated, not just "informed" but the second part of "informed consent" is now being whacked, too. The vaccines are mandated but government has kept hidden from most parents the information that they can get exemptions. Now, though, with parents learning things on their own and are increasingly not bringing their children for vaccines, or limiting the numbers of vaccines, the pharmaceutical industry has a problem. Everything they have planned since WWII depends on ignorant compliance.

Controlling informed was not enough - parents have gotten word out and other parents are worried - so, now consent must be gotten rid of. Thus the push is to remove ALL EXEMPTIONS from vaccines.

in Australia, vaccination is voluntary, and vaccine myths are unraveling and parents in increasing numbers are refusing them for their children.

"So many Australian parents are taking charge of their children’s health and making informed vaccination decisions, in fact, the Australian government is now working feverishly to dissuade and re-indoctrinate them back into the vaccine fold. According to 3AW 693 News Talk in Australia, the Australian Medical Association, along with the Academy of Science, has published a 20-page propaganda pamphlet that attempts to discard all the opposing science against vaccines as “common myths,” and instead reassure everyone that vaccines are perfectly safe.

"But people are not buying it, and the establishment “down under” is starting to panic. [Emphasis added.]

In fact, the Australian government is now pushing to remove voluntary vaccination and to mandate vaccines like in the US.

In the US, parents are no longer blindly accepting that vaccines are safe. Did the CDC lawsuit in which they refused but ultimately had to cough up evidence that they've known the vaccines are dangerous make a difference? Or all the outbreaks of measles and pertussis in heavily vaccinated children? Or the FOIAs in the UK, showing the UK government and corporations conspired to hide from the public that the vaccines not only don't work but cause the diseases they were said to prevent? Or was it big studies showing unvaccinated children are much healthier than vaccinated one, or a bigger study in China showing how much vaccines contribute to adverse events?

Studies outside the US show unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated children

Unvaccinated Children are healthier

Groundbreaking Chinese Study Finds 42% Of Drug Reactions Are Vaccine Related

Does it matter what truth is prompting parents to protect their children from vaccines? The biggest truth isn't even on the table.

What's obvious are two things:

1. Big Pharma, which ran Nazi experiments with vaccines, is having none of the Nuremberg Code. Kids will be in their experiment whether the parents want it or not, whether the parents see the harm or not.


( Editorial Board at USA Today recently ran an opinion piece in which they praised the vaccine industry and espoused Big Pharma propaganda and myths to convince Americans to be vaccinated.

"The USA Today article claimed that measles is making a comeback thanks to “a growing anti-vaccine movement and misinformation that is spreading like a contagious disease.” This fraudulent claim is made despite the fact that most children who catch the disease have already been vaccinated for it. Furthermore, the MMR vaccine for measles was actually designed to fail, which is evidenced by the fact that Merck Co. faked its vaccine test results to fabricate a “95% efficacy rate.”

"USA Today also promotes the unscientific “herd immunity” theory. According to this theory, if enough of the population is vaccinated, then immunity is somehow achieved for everyone. The problem with this theory is that vaccines only affect those who receive them. They cause a reaction in the body which may produce antibodies that can help prevent or mitigate the disease, thus building temporary “immunity.” However, those who don’t receive vaccines usually develop these antibodies, and immunity, naturally and permanently. In many cases, vaccines destroy the immune system, making it easier for the body to succumb to disease and disorder. Vaccinated individuals also serve as carriers of disease, spreading it to the rest of the population and putting those who haven’t developed immunity yet at risk.

“Herd immunity” has never been scientifically validated, nor has the efficacy of vaccines to prevent disease. Yet, some actually believe that unvaccinated children put vaccinated ones at risk of catching disease, and that vaccines only work when a certain amount of the population has received them.

"Furthermore, vaccines have been linked to a number of health issues, including developmental problems, autism, gastrointestinal issues and brain inflammation.

"USA Today claims that parents “ought to be able to opt out for strictly defined medical or religious reasons” but not for “personal opinions.” They then conclude, “Everyone enjoys the life-saving benefits vaccines provide, but they’ll exist only as long as everyone shares in the risks.” On the contrary, vaccines only “benefit” those who receive them, and parents should have the right to decide whether to subject their children to a cocktail of chemicals, heavy metals and biological tissue, which could cause permanent, life-damaging harm. To suggest otherwise, while ignoring the hazards of vaccines and promoting their manufacturers’ non-scientific theories on immunity, is misleading and immoral."

2. Big Pharma is right now carrying out the results of its Nazi experiments, and for the same reason - genocide.

Let's all applaud Bill Gates, the Rockefellers, and the other pharmaceutical industry giants, who run the CDC and the WHO, for their truly astounding success in promoting the false paradigm of vaccines and keeping it afloat despite deaths and destruction of children. But even more incredible, they have succeeded in hiding genocide itself in a public cloud of while lies about safety of vaccines and virulent attacks on anyone who dares resist. The real criminal intent of vaccines has been utterly unseen in the commotion.

The CDC is lying that the vaccines are safe, but they have every reason to believe, for the real purpose the vaccines are being used for, that they are effective. If not the first time, then the second, or the third or the fourth, or the fifth, or combining them, or making them unceasing, or adding more, getting pregnant mothers to take them. One way of another, the pharmaceutical industry is making sure its WWII experiments are "effective."

Falling teen pregnancy rates, falling birth rates, rising miscarriage and still birth rates, are their accomplishment.

And when one looks at who they are, why, we've known them all along, whether we call them the bankers or the Cabal or the pharmaceutical industry. It's all the same. And geocide coming from them arrives as no real surprise, as they are literal murderers. Waking up to depth of their depravity, comes in a second.

That shock makes it simple for parents. Vaccines are not for health. They may once have been, but now, without question, they are for sterilizing children.

It is time to demand an injunction against all mandated vaccines and a criminal investigation into the use of polysorbate 80 in vaccines and any products that arrange for it to enter children's bodies."

Saturday, April 26, 2014


Much of this article is full of shit as they refuse to deal with the elephant in the living room - i.e., VACCINES!!!

However despite the lamestream media's refusal to tell the bloody truth, many Americans are now seeing vaccines for what they really are -- BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS. The escalating rate of damaged children in the U.S. has NOTHING to do with better diagnosis and everything to do with the fact that they are being deliberately poisoned.

And indeed, this poisoning begins while they are in the womb with ignorant mothers choosing to get vaccinated during pregnancy.

It's wakey wakey time people. How many lives have to be destroyed before Americans say NO MORE!!!

Source Article:
Autism rates soar, now affects 1 in 68 children

"Autism rates climbed nearly 30% between 2008 and 2010 and have more than doubled since the turn of the century, according to a new study from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The condition is now believed to affect one of every 68 8-year-olds – up from one in 88 just two years earlier.

That means virtually every grade in every elementary school has at least one child with autism – a seemingly astonishing rise for a condition that was nearly unheard of a generation ago.

What's still unknown is the driver of that increase. Many experts believe the rise is largely due to better awareness and diagnosis rather than a true increase in the number of children with the condition.

"We don't know the extent those factors explain in terms of the increase, but we clearly know they do play a role," said Coleen Boyle, director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities at the CDC. "Our system tells us what's going on. It (only) gives us clues as to the why."

The aging of parents is also known to be a factor; the chances of autism increase with the age of parents at conception.

"But that's not the whole story is it?" said Robert Ring, chief science officer for Autism Speaks, a research and advocacy group. Whether something in the environment could be causing the uptick remains "the million-dollar question," Ring said.

Despite their concern, experts said they were not surprised by the increase, because other data had suggested the numbers would continue to climb. In New Jersey, for instance, autism rates were 50% higher than in the rest of the nation in 2000, and they remained that much higher in 2010 – suggesting the national rates will continue to rise to catch up, said Walter Zahorodny, a psychologist who directs the New Jersey Autism Study. "To me it seems like autism prevalence can only get higher," he said.

The new study also showed that blacks continue to lag behind whites and Hispanics in diagnoses. Zahorodny, also an assistant professor at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, said the gap has persisted for so long that he thinks it may be real – that blacks may be less vulnerable to autism for some unknown reason. Others are quicker to blame lack of medical access for the difference.

"We know that there are significant under-diagnosis problems in minority communities and among women and girls," said Ari Ne'eman, a member of the National Council on Disability and president of the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network. The group tries to empower autistic people to advocate for themselves. The new CDC numbers show five times more boys with autism than girls. The girls and blacks who have intellectual disabilities as well as autism are getting counted, but the smarter kids are not, said Ne'eman, who has autism himself. "Many of the cases that are easier to miss are being missed in those populations."

To be diagnosed on autism spectrum, someone must have deficits in three areas: communications, social skills and typical behavior. Roughly one-third of the children in the CDC study also had intellectual deficits, with the remainder showing normal or above-average intelligence.

To come up with its new figures, the CDC reviewed medical and school records from 2010 at 11 different sites across the country. There is a huge range in autism prevalence across those sites, from one child in 175 found with autism in Alabama, to one in 46 in New Jersey. Boyle said the difference may be explained, at least in part, by differences in community resources for identifying and serving children with autism. Other reporting sites were in Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin.

The CDC has used the same method to determine autism prevalence every two years since 2000, showing a 120% increase in autism rates between 2000 and 2010.

The average age a child is diagnosed with autism has fallen, but remains above age 4 – though diagnosis is possible by age 2. Research suggests that the earlier a child with autism receives therapy the better the chance of limiting their deficits.

The message to parents is that if they have concerns about their child's early play, speech or movement, they should raise those concerns with with doctors and caregivers, Boyle said.

Prevalence rates quickly become fodder for politics. Several members of Congress and advocacy groups took the opportunity Thursday to promote continued funding for autism treatment and research. The $780 million Combatting Autism Act is currently up for renewal.

"This is a loud message to people in Washington that we need leadership here," said Liz Feld, president of Autism Speaks. "A national strategy that addresses all the needs of the autism community across the lifespan is what is needed now more than ever."

Others criticized the suggestion that the rising numbers reflect an "epidemic" of autism. Instead, Ne'eman argued: "Autism is something that we're born with, that always existed."

Source Article:
New Autism Study Raises More Questions About the Safety of Vaccines

Autism beings in the womb...end of story? -

I already know this post is going to spark controversy. I’m not a huge fan of controversy but I am realistic, logical, and have a good amount of common sense and I am usually the one exposing the elephant in the room, especially if it needs to be talked about. This post, is about one of those elephants. As soon as autism and vaccines are mentioned in the same sentence the war march music is queued. One side will feel vindicated, the other will be down-right mad, but despite all of that, our kids deserve this discourse. We deserve this discourse. So let’s not cue the music just yet.

Autism begins in the womb…end of story?
There’s a new study out that suggests autism begins in the womb. You can’t miss it because it’s been a top story on every news venue for the last week. With this new study came re-energized backlash and an attempt to take the focus off of vaccinations as a probable cause:

“See? I told you vaccines don’t cause autism. It starts in the womb! This study proves it. Case closed. Go home, sit down, shut up, and vaccinate your kid.”

Yes, because the risk of autism is the only reason I don’t vaccinate my child. I sure hope nobody read about this study and decided to take their kids for shots the next day. I have a problem with this type of rhetoric and to be honest, it scares me that people are so quick to shut the door on something as serious as autism. This study doesn’t “close the case,” it pushes it wide open. If you are questioning vaccines, or think vaccines may be linked to autism, this study actually supports that premise and makes it even more imperative that we start objectively questioning everything that gets injected into our bodies with more scrutiny.

The study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is pretty straight-forward but contains a lot of big words. Here’s the jist: Researchers did a small explorative study analyzing postmortem brain samples of 22 children – 11 with autism and 11 without. They found that 10 of the 11 autistic children had certain brain characteristics (along with 1 of the non-autistic children).

“We observed focal patches of abnormal laminar cytoarchitecture and cortical disorganization of neurons, but not glia, in prefrontal and temporal cortical tissue from 10 of 11 children with autism and from 1 of 11 unaffected children.”

This new study may indeed give clues on how autism develops – but a “small explorative study” involving only 11 autistic children and 11 non-autistic children hardly constitutes enough evidence to hang our hats on – especially when there were two children who did not have the brain samples one would expect them to have.

In comparison, there was a study that showed the presence of measles vaccine-strain virus (from the MMR live virus vaccine) in the guts of twelve autistic children that sparked an international controversy questioning the safety of vaccines. Yes I know it was retracted (and not because his results were wrong but because an individual with ties to the vaccine industry accused Wakefield of being unethical). Yes, I know Wakefield has been exonerated. And no, he didn’t say the MMR vaccine “caused” autism…he simply pointed out the obvious connection – many autistic children have chronic bowel inflammation, and have the vaccine strain of the measles virus in their intestines. What I also know is that his findings were confirmed and duplicated by over 12 world-renowned researchers, in four different countries, and by more than 28 studies but that was deemed insufficient evidence to warrant further investigation – in fact that was deemed to be no evidence at all. I don’t know about you, but the only thing I ever saw on prime time news was a smear campaign.

If the researchers from this new autism study looked for or discovered a vaccine-mealses virus in their samples, you better believe this article wouldn’t have made prime-time. I only brought up the “W” word because despite what you may believe, there’s a bias in our country favoring vaccines and this study proves it. People are so quick to say that vaccines are exonerated based on one, “small explorative” (by their own definition) study. Let’s be real, this study proves nothing, it only raises more questions that demand further studies.

But, for the sake of this post we’re all going to assume that this new study is gold, that it 100% without a doubt proves that autism starts in the womb. In the legal profession we call this a non-contested issue. In a fast-pitch softball game we’d call this a slow pitch. I’m giving it to you. I’m letting you walk to first base. If I don’t, we’ll spend all day trying to find “evidence” to contradict the “evidence.” Instead, we’re going to use the same evidence that’s being used to shut the door on the “autism vaccine debate” to support our position and pressure the mainstream scientific community to look at the real issues. Autism is unacceptable and so are all of the other conditions our kids experience because of what comes through the needle.

So let’s break it down. If autism starts in utero, then vaccines can’t possibly play a role right?
I hate to point out the obvious here but most pregnant women in the United States are vaccinated and receive flu shots while pregnant. According to the CDC, the hepatitis A vaccine, Tdap (a category C drug that has not been tested for fetal or reproductive harm), and influenza vaccines are recommended for pregnant women. Polio, hepatitis B, and meningococal vaccine can also be given. Yellow fever vaccine (a category “C” live virus vaccine never tested for safety in fetuses) can even be given if the “benefits (there are none) outweigh the risks (there are many).”

How do these vaccines effect the development of a fetus? Nobody knows. But we do know from reading the vaccine package inserts, “clinical trials,” and objective studies done, that vaccines in children can cause encephalitis, neurological disorders, and developmental delays and that vaccines have caused the same, along with autism-like symptoms in animals. Is a fetus immune to the same reality? Pregnant women who opt to receive the vaccine are the test subjects – although supporters of the mainstream are going to look the other way if the results aren’t favorable.

In addition, several vaccine package inserts state that a woman should not become pregnant within three months of being vaccinated (see MMR and Varicella inserts). Women go in asking their doctor how they should prepare for pregnancy and the doctor recommends they get vaccinated. Um, problem here…how many doctors have read the package insert themselves – probably very few because I am willing to bet no woman has ever heard of needing to take extra precautions in the bedroom after being vaccinated. Have you?

What happens if she doesn’t and gets pregnant? Well…nobody knows but it is thought that these live viruses that cause fetal abnormalities when injected into pregnant women, cause the same type of abnormalities if still circulating in the body when a woman becomes pregnant – hence the importance of the warning that nobody read.

What caused the abnormal brain samples in the NEJM study? Anything but the vaccines right? To me, it seems vaccines haven’t been ruled out as a possible cause so don’t get your shots just yet.

Ultrasounds, Vaccines, and Autism
There’s another way vaccines could be the final building block that sends a child spiraling into the depths of autism and like vaccines given during pregnancy, this theory also supports the findings of the study. During pregnancy women are subjected to 2-3 ultrasounds minimum (unless you opt out). If you’re high risk you’ll have more or you might be one of those women who get elective scans…just for funzies. No one thinks twice about it.

I’m sure your doctor never informed you of the risks of that “routine” ultrasound but minimal research on this issue would reveal that ultrasounds have not only been linked to autism but have proven to be harmful to a developing brain. The effects of ultrasound waves on the brain show the same abnormalities as discovered in the brain samples of the newest autism study.

Each scan heats surrounding tissues and bones up to six degrees higher than the maximum determined level of safety and since 1993 the FDA has allowed high-output machines to scan babies at eight times the tolerable level without conducting any epidemiological studies. Ultrasounds cause cavitation - where gas pockets in tissues and body fluids form and collapse due to high frequency sound waves. Cells in the brain are very sensitive to cavitation and can divide, migrate, and form too many mini-columns.

This same “cavitation” process via “ultrasonic cleaning” is frequently used to remove rust, dirt, lime scale, grease and tightly adhering service contaminates from watches, surgical instruments, industrial parts, firearms, and electronic equipment. The longer the session the more cavitation occurs. People are now using ultrasound technology to agitate the fat right off of their bodies.

What type of effect do you think this has on the protective coverings of neurons in the developing brain of a fetus? If ultrasounds can dissolve fat right off the body and rust right off of metal than why would anyone naively think ultrasounds can’t strip the protective fat coverings right off of neurons or create a condition of autism susceptibility by “disrupting the cortical laminar architecture in the cortexes” as the NEJM study puts it. If you think I’m overreacting about ultrasounds, find the thousands of women who had what used to be “routine” x-rays during their pregnancy and discover how that one turned out.

Babies aren’t born with autism.
The NEJM study shows that while a condition in the brain makes children susceptible to developing autism it didn’t address a cause. Is it mere coincidence that most children develop symptoms of autism between 15-18 months of age when they receive their scheduled vaccines which include: DTaP, Hib, PCV, IPV, flu shot, MMR, Varicella, and Hep A? In case you were wondering, that’s 12 vaccines people. Twelve vaccines that are not proven save individually, let alone safe to use in conjunction.

There are also two vaccines (varicella and MMR) which are live virus vaccines that have the ability to pass through the blood brain barrier. All children are teething during these formative months and histamines released during teething give these viruses direct access to the brain – brains that as the NEJM showed, are compromised. And then there are vaccine additives – heavy metals, genetic materials from animals, aborted fetal cells injected directly into the blood stream and when not excreted, also have an affinity for the gut and the brain.

What this new study tells me, is that we need to be very careful what we consume, inject, and expose a pregnant body too and what our children are injected with. The administration of vaccines, ultrasounds, (antibiotics that inhibit proper gut flora, genetically modified foods, or any number of things) during pregnancy can create a condition in the brain of a developing baby that makes one more susceptible to developing autism, and a vaccine during infancy or toddlerhood could be the icing on the cake for a child who has this autistic pre-disposition.

Maybe vaccines don’t directly cause autism but numerous studies show a causal relationship that warrants further investigation. This new study doesn’t exonerate vaccines. It makes the likelihood even stronger that there is a connection – whether vaccines are the direct cause or the fuel on an already raging fire."


Americans have been so duped into believing they need to kill the "weeds" around their houses. But many of these plants are not only edible but they even CURE DISEASE!

Some "weeds" have very deep roots, and these roots pull up nutrients out of the deep soil which feed other plants. Weeds often proliferate in depleted soil because they are helpers!!! They correct the depletion in the soil by pulling up much needed nutrients from the deep Earth.

No matter what, these plants are essential for healthy living -- not only for our own bodies, but the body of Mother Earth. It absolutely insane to put poison all around one's home to try to get rid of them.

Source Article:
Wild Edible Plants: Cure Cancer, Depression, And High Blood Pressure (Video).

Don’t kill these wonderful flowers! I eat these flowers in my salad delicious! The whole plant is edible!

Dandelion is a very rich source of beta-carotene which we convert into vitamin A. This flowering plant is also rich in vitamin C, fiber, potassium, iron, calcium, magnesium, zinc, and phosphorus. It is a good place to get B complex vitamins, trace minerals, organic sodium, and even vitamin D. Dandelion contains protein too, more than spinach. It has been eaten for thousands of years and used to treat anemia, scurvy, skin problems, blood disorders, and depression.

Cancer – Dandelion acts against cancer to slow its growth and prevent its spread. The leaves are especially rich in the antioxidants and phytonutrients that combat cancer.

Diabetes – Recent animal studies show promise that dandelion helps regulate blood sugar and insulin levels.

Wood Sorrel- Oxalis, another common name for this plant, literally means “sour” and is named as such due to its oxalic acid content. Many domesticated vegetables, including spinach and broccoli, also contain oxalic acid, which is considered toxic when consumed in large quantities because it inhibits the absorption of calcium. Oxalic acid is not considered a problem when consumed moderately and with a varied diet, however people with gout, rheumatism, arthritis, hyperacidity and kidney stones should avoid it.

In moderate dosages, wood sorrel is cooling (refrigerant, febrifuge), diuretic, stomachic (soothing to the stomach, relieves indigestion), astringent, and catalytic.

Wild Lettuce, It is known for having mild sedative and pain relieving properties, due to a milky substance called lactucarium which is found in the leaves and stem of the plant. The effects of lactucarium are considered to be similar to opium, though the substance contains no actual opiates. These effects earned wild lettuce the common name of opium lettuce.

They have wild lettuce in smoking blends…I have smoked wild lettuce it was kind of hard on the throat but I definetly felt relaxed after smoking it. Although, I don’t encourage smoking…honestly you are sometimes better off just not smoking anything at all.

Chickweed, helps the body absorb nutrients better.

It is a safe and nourishing herb for a person of any age to take over several months when weak, chronically tired from overwork and stress, traumatized, anemic or recovering from a long-term illness or surgery.

Chickweed benefits women working to reduce and eliminate breast cysts, ovarian cysts, uterine fibroids or lymphadema. Eat a few fresh handfuls chopped into salad as often as possible or take a glycerite, succus or tincture made from the fresh herb two to three times per day over several months. Continue using the herb as a preventive three to four times a week after the growth disappears or is removed surgically.

Clover, The herb reduces breast inflammations (mastitis) and breast pains. It detoxifies the lymph, lungs, liver, kidneys, and blood. In cases of gout, it is useful for decreasing the concentration of uric acid.

It is also a good expectorant, and soothes the spasms of the bronchi, convulsive cough and children’s cough. It is anti-asthmatic and reduces the symptoms affections, such as syphilis; it stimulates biliary secretion and relaxes the muscles.

The herb has other uses too: it decongests the salivary glands, decreases arthritis pains, and reduces ocular inflammations. It has a relaxing effect on the nervous system, adjusting the psycho-emotional balance and contributing to the development of communication abilities.

Wild Edible Plants in Your Backyard

Well…I’m off to pick some wild edible plants!

Stay groovy!

Happy Earth Day :)


Radical Rose

Thursday, April 17, 2014


We have already seen that infant swaddling causes a high stress response in infants -- and that they are not sleeping while being swaddled, but are suffering with extremely high levels of cortisol. This indicates that babies are IN SHOCK while being swaddled and that they have SHUT DOWN, expecting that their true needs will never be met.

Additionally, we have also seen that infant swaddling causes delays in breastfeeding and may be contributing to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

As if all of that were not enough, we now also see that infant swaddling causes developmental hip problems in babies and even hip dislocation. Although the article below argues that there are "safe" ways to swaddle, indeed anyone connected to their intuition will clearly see that infant swaddling is not only dangerous, but can cause life-long, debilitating problems.


Source Article:
Swaddling babies can cause them hip problems, doctors warn

The practice of swaddling babies, which has become fashionable as a way to calm them, risks causing them hip problems as they grow, doctors warn.

Parents have been turning to the old-fashioned practice in order to settle their babies and help them sleep better. Swaddling, which involves wrapping the baby in sheets or blankets with their legs out straight and arms pinned so that they cannot move, has been shown to induce sleep and soothe excessive crying and colic.

But, say doctors who specialise in orthopaedics, evidence shows that the practice increases the risk of developmental hip abnormalities. Professor Nicholas Clarke of Southampton University hospital writes in the journal Archives of Disease in Childhood that one in five babies are born with a hip abnormality, perhaps because of a breech birth or family history. Although these can resolve unaided, swaddling can delay it.

Swaddling has become more popular, says Clarke. Nine out of 10 infants in north America are now swaddled in the first six months of life. Sales of swaddling clothes increased in the UK by 61% between 2010 and 2011.

But studies have shown that babies who do not have their legs free to bend and kick can suffer dislocation or abnormal development of the hip.

"A high incidence of hip dislocation was reported in Navajo Indians who strapped their infants to a board," Clarke writes. "In Japan, an educational programme initially aimed at grandmothers was commissioned to prevent traditional swaddling." The programme cut the incidence of hip dislocation from between 1.1% and 3.5% to just 0.2%.

Clarke says that parents should be advised on "safe swaddling" if their babies are at risk of hip development problems. "In order to allow for healthy hip development, legs should be able to bend up and out at the hips. This position allows for natural development of the hip joints. The babies' legs should not be tightly wrapped in extension and pressed together."

Commercial products for swaddling babies should have a loose pouch or sack for the legs and feet, allowing plenty of room for movement, he says.

Other experts agreed with him. "There is indeed evidence that swaddling can affect the normal development of infants' hips," said Andreas Roposch, consultant orthopaedic surgeon at Great Ormond Street hospital.

"Similar effects may be seen in all devices or manoeuvres that place the legs in a purely straight position for prolonged periods in this critical age of early infancy. Swaddling should not be employed in my view as there is no health benefit but a risk of adverse consequences."

Dr Alastair Sutcliffe, reader in general paediatrics at the Institute of Child Health, University College London, said swaddling had been known to be associated with an increased risk of congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) for many years.

"The archetypal example is in traditions where a baby is carried with their legs splayed around a mother's waist such as in Nigeria, where there is a virtually unseen rate of CDH, whereas in a country where swaddling is employed, such as far-eastern countries, there is a much higher rate of CDH.

"I would advise that if a baby needs to be wrapped up to get off to sleep that parents do this in a sympathetic and loose manner, not tight, especially around the babies' hips."

Wednesday, April 16, 2014


40 percent of infants in the U.S. 'live in fear or distrust of their parents', and that will translate into aggressiveness, defiance and hyperactivity as they grow into adults.

How many of you know a child or adult who has a hard time "regulating" their anger? THIS is what is at the root of the problem and one of the main reasons I have created the Birth of a New Earth Curriculum -- i.e., to prevent the damage being done to our species (and all of life) as a result of lack of bonding. For those interested to view the curriculum, which stresses the importance of doing preparatory work prior to the conception of children, go here.

The article below raises some interesting points. However, it grossly underestimates the severity of the problem and fails to mention that hospital birth is a MAJOR culprit in interfering with bonding.

Here's an excerpt. Full text is below..

"Four out of 10 infants born in the United States do not form a strong bond with either parent, and they will pay for that the rest of their lives, a new study has found.

Research from Princeton University has shown the number of babies born into families that are poorly equipped to give them a fair chance at having a successful life is alarmingly high...

The main problem, according to the Princeton study, is 40 percent of infants in the U.S. 'live in fear or distrust of their parents', and that will translate into aggressiveness, defiance and hyperactivity as they grow into adults.

Of that number, 25 percent don't bond with their parents because the parents aren't responding to their needs. Some 15 percent find their parents so distressing that they will avoid them whenever possible...

'It's not a make or break situation, but they might find it harder to regulate their behavior.'..."

Source Article:
FOUR out of 10 babies do not form a strong enough bond with their parents - and it affects them for life!

"New Princeton University research shows the importance of parental bonding in the long-run

Some 40 per cent of infants are living in fear or distrust of their parents because of a lack of bonding as children

Poverty, ignorance and stress said to be the main factors preventing the bond from forming

Researchers study basic bonding is simple to achieve and can come just from touching and sensitivity

It gives the child a sense of security and allows them to know their needs have been met

Four out of 10 infants born in the United States do not form a strong bond with either parent, and they will pay for that the rest of their lives, a new study has found.

Research from Princeton University has shown the number of babies born into families that are poorly equipped to give them a fair chance at having a successful life is alarmingly high.

Additionally, a study from the University of Rochester showing that nearly one-third of U.S. parents don't know what to expect from their newborns, or how to help them grow and learn and get along with others.

It's bonding time: A new study says not enough parents are properly bonding with their babies, which creates greater problems later in life. However researchers say basic bonding is simple

The main problem, according to the Princeton study, is 40 percent of infants in the U.S. 'live in fear or distrust of their parents', and that will translate into aggressiveness, defiance and hyperactivity as they grow into adults.

Of that number, 25 percent don't bond with their parents because the parents aren't responding to their needs.

Some 15 percent find their parents so distressing that they will avoid them whenever possible.

'They can overcome it,' sociologist Sophie Moullin of Princeton, lead author of that study, told ABC News.

'It's not a make or break situation, but they might find it harder to regulate their behavior.'

Moullin, along with coauthors from Columbia University and the University of Bristol in England, analyzed more than 100 research projects, including data collected by a U.S. longitudinal study of 14,000 children born in 2001, to reach their conclusions.

While many factors contribute to the problem - including poverty, ignorance, and stress - critical bonding is simple to achieve, researchers say.

'When a parent, most of the time, responds to a child in a warm, sensitive and responsive way - picking up the child when they cry, and holding and reassuring them - the child feels secure that they can meet their needs,' the study notes.

Other research shows that simply touching, or caressing, a newborn is critical to the infant's sense of security.

The study also says that the bond can be with either parent, not necessarily both, but studies of childhood crime and risky behavior contend that for boys, the bond is more important with the father, and for girls, the bond is relatively more important with the mother.

Mother's touch: Researcher's say that little things like sensitivity when picking up a crying child and even a soft touch makes the child feel secure

Nearly all of these studies are based on observation of children over an extended period of time.

Researchers usually pay more attention to the child than the parent, because the lack of a bond is more apparent in the infant.

One innovative technique is called the 'strange situation'.

The parent leaves the baby with a caregiver for about 20 minutes, and then either the parent or a stranger reenters the room.

The reaction to the returning parent, compared to the arrival of a stranger, tells volumes about the relationship between parent and child.

If a failed relationship is detected, especially when the infant is six months old or younger, the chances of helping the parent and the child form a strong bond is greatly improved, the study notes.

The fact that damage can begin that young should be sobering to parents.

However, often the parents most in need of help are the least likely to seek it.

Moullin said researchers in one study had observed 2-year-olds over several months and were able to predict which ones would have the most trouble years later in school, based on the child's level of poverty.

The bond can be with either parent, but studies of childhood crime and risky behavior contend that the bond is more important with the father for boys, and for girls, the bond is relatively more important with the mother

The bond can be with either parent, but studies of childhood crime and risky behavior contend that the bond is more important with the father for boys, and for girls, the bond is relatively more important with the mother

Usually, it's the mother who is the central focus of studies like these, probably because the mom is the main caregiver, especially in the early years.

But a study at the University of Iowa two years ago concluded that 'being attached to dad is just as helpful as being close to mom'.

That is critical during the first two years of life.

A similar study in 2012 from the Imperial College London found that fathers were especially important in helping the infant avoid behavioral problems later in life.

If the father is remote or distracted, the child is more likely to be aggressive.

This is a problem that is not going to go away, and some percentage of parents will never be able to do a decent job because of a wide variety of reasons.

But what all these studies show is the importance of those first few months of life, when a tiny baby is sent on a trajectory that will partly determine success at something as simple - and as critical - as getting along with others."


You read that right folks -- a 4250% increase in dead babies amongst those who were stupid enough to receive the flu shot during pregnancy.

It's definitely wakey wakey time.

Source Article:
Studies Find Flu Shots Can Harm Your Heart, Infant And Fetus

Studies Find Flu Shots Can Harm Your Heart, Infant And Fetus

Flu vaccines, according to the best scientific evidence available today, will only work against 10% of the circulating viruses that cause the symptoms of seasonal epidemic influenza. Additionally, flu vaccines have been found to elicit inflammatory reactions that may harm the human heart, the developing fetus, and the fragile immune systems of our infants. So, do the theoretical benefits really outweigh the known harms?

In a recent article, The Shocking Lack of Evidence Supporting Flu Vaccines, we addressed the surprising lack of empirical evidence supporting the use of flu vaccines in the prevention of seasonal influenza, in children under two, healthy adults, the elderly, and healthcare workers who care for the elderly.

The reality is that vaccines not only do not work as advertised, but they represent a significant health threat, likely on the same order of magnitude as influenza itself, due to their well-known role in compromising immunological self-tolerance (autoimmunity), as well as by eliciting a wide range of adverse health effects associated with the use of adjuvants, preservatives, foreign animal DNA and cell byproducts, adventitious viruses, and other so-called "inactive ingredients," including even the unnatural route and method of antigen administration itself.[i]

Basic Virology Facts Reveal Trivalent Flu Vaccines Are At Best 10% Effective

But it shouldn't take expensive, elaborate, time-consuming research to grasp the obvious limitations in effectiveness of flu vaccines from the perspective of this fundamental fact of influenza virology:
Over 200 viruses cause influenza and influenza-like illness which produce the same symptoms (fever, headache, aches and pains, cough and runny noses). Without laboratory tests, doctors cannot tell the two illnesses apart. Both last for days and rarely lead to death or serious illness. At best, vaccines might be effective against only Influenza A and B, which represent about 10% of all circulating viruses." (Source: Cochrane Summaries).

Indeed, if facts like these were not so commonly ignored or denied, and it was the actually clinically-confirmed, unequivocal "evidence" that drove the so-called "evidence-based" medical system into its annual, seasonal influenza-induced, frenzy of pro-vaccine propagandizing and proselytizing, we might look at this ritual of mass vaccination as something other than just a profit-, policy-, and, for the masses, faith-based indoctrination, which sadly it has become.

"Science-Based" Medicine Unwilling To Look At Empirical Evidence On Vaccine Harms

Similarly, were those self-avowed "skeptics," and would-be advocates of "science-based medicine," who claim vaccinating is always safer and more effective than not vaccinating, to acknowledge research indicating the limitations and increasing failings of vaccination, as well as the value of natural influenza flu alternatives,* they might someday earn the right to use powerful-sounding words like "Science" and "Evidence" in their crusade against your access to the empirical truth and your right to bodily self-possession, i.e. your right to make free and informed decisions for yourself to engage or disengage from medical interventions, that carry a known risk of harm and even death.

The reality is that many top biomedical journals cannot and will not suppress the truth concerning the many unintended, adverse health effects of vaccines. This would, after all, be both immoral and illegal, especially when human lives, and particularly the lives of our most vulnerable, our children, are on the line. In other words, by publishing empirical research that shows vaccines are not safe and effective a priori, many thwart the party line, as represented by the policies and official statements of the CDC, the FDA, and the ACIP, and many online skeptic bloggers (anti-anti-vaccine groups, if you will; most whom fail to grasp the foolishness of such a dialectic, since they rarely take a critical look in the mirror) who claim those refusing vaccines, or educating about their harms, are guilty of crimes, or have blood on their hands.

Flu Vaccines Found To Increase Heart Attack Risk

For example, a concerning study published in 2011 in the International Journal of Medicine revealed a fact rarely addressed by conventional health authorities, or the mostly uncritical mainstream media, namely: flu vaccines result in inflammatory cardiovascular changes indicative of increased risk for serious heart-related events such as heart attack.[ii]

Titled, "Inflammation-related effects of adjuvant influenza A vaccination on platelet activation and cardiac autonomic function," their study concluded:
Together with an inflammatory reaction, influenza A vaccine induced platelet activation and sympathovagal imbalance towards adrenergic predominance. Significant correlations were found between CRP [C-reactive protein) levels and HRV [heart rate variability] parameters, suggesting a pathophysiological link between inflammation and cardiac autonomic regulation. The vaccine-related platelet activation and cardiac autonomic dysfunction may transiently increase the risk of cardiovascular events.
The four main areas of concern mentioned above are:

Platelet Activation: An indicator of increased risk for pathological clotting and/or obstruction of a blood vessel, e.g. heart attack, embolism or stroke.

Sympathovagal imbalance towards adrenergic predominance: An indication of disturbed autonomic regulation within the heart.

Elevation of C-Reactive Protein: An indicator of inflammation-mediated cardiovascular disease risk.

Reduced Heart Rate Variability: An indicator of increased heart disease risk.

Flu Vaccines Found To Adversely Affect Pregnant Women

This study is not, however, the first to raise concern over states of pathological inflammation caused by flu vaccines, and vaccines in general. In 2011, the journal Vaccine published a study titled, "Inflammatory responses to trivalent influenza virus vaccine among pregnant women," which found that flu vaccination causes measurable increases in inflammation in pregnant women which may increase the risk of preeclempsia and other adverse outcomes such as preterm birth.[iii] In this study both CRP and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels increased to concerning levels between one to two days after vaccination. Should we be surprised, considering flu vaccines still contain highly inflammatory, neurotoxic and immunotoxic heavy metals, such as mercury-based thimerosal? Even when the precautionary principle is employed, and mercury-based adjuvants removed in tacit recognition of its profound dangers, aluminum hydroxide is then used to replace it, injected directly into the bodies of healthy infants in the name of synthetically modifying and "improving" their immunity (see: Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?).

And so, despite the fact that vaccine-induced disruption and dysregulation of a pregnant woman's immune system could compromise her pregnancy, resulting in birth defects[iv] and miscarriage (which is a well-known phenomena within the veterinary field: vaccine-induced abortion), the CDC has defied both common sense and the precautionary principle by urging pregnant women to receive flu vaccines, without informing them of their true risks.

Infants At Risk of Pathological Inflammation Following Vaccines

Just as disturbing is the CDC's recommendation that all infants, six months or older, receive flu vaccines on top of an already burgeoning vaccination schedule, which begins at the day of birth with the STD vaccine containing hepatitis B surface antigen, despite clear evidence that infants experience cardiorespiratory complications and C-reactive protein responses as a result of all vaccines, administered either singularly or simultaneously in combination. One 2007 study published in the Journal of Pediatrics, found that 85% of newborn infants experienced abnormal elevations of CRP when administered multiple vaccines and up to 70% in those given a single vaccine. Also, overall, 16% of infants were reported to experience vaccine-associated cardiorespiratory events within 48 hours postimmunization. [v]

Suffice it to say, vaccinating against the flu (or any pathogen) is not as safe and effective as we are being told. But please do not adopt my opinion on the matter as your own. Do your own research, and feel free to review some of the underreported and/or otherwise suppressed research on vaccination we have collated at our Vaccine Research and Education page.

*Never mind the timelessly and often cross-culturally confirmed and reconfirmed evidence contained within "orally transmitted" traditional, plant-based medical systems, used the world over.


[i], Adverse Health Effects of Vaccination

[ii] Gaetano A Lanza, Lucy Barone, Giancarla Scalone, Dario Pitocco, Gregory A Sgueglia, Roberto Mollo, Roberto Nerla, Francesco Zaccardi, Giovanni Ghirlanda, Filippo Crea. Inflammation-related effects of adjuvant influenza A vaccination on platelet activation and cardiac autonomic function. J Intern Med. 2010 Sep 1. Epub 2010 Sep 1. PMID: 20964738

[iii] Lisa M Christian, Jay D Iams, Kyle Porter, Ronald Glaser. Inflammatory responses to trivalent influenza virus vaccine among pregnant women. Vaccine. 2011 Sep 20. Epub 2011 Sep 20. PMID: 21945263

[iv] Margaret A K Ryan, Tyler C Smith, Carter J Sevick, William K Honner, Rosha A Loach, Cynthia A Moore, J David Erickson. Birth defects among infants born to women who received anthrax vaccine in pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15 ;168(4):434-42. Epub 2008 Jul 2. PMID: 18599489

[v] Massroor Pourcyrous, Sheldon B Korones, Kristopher L Arheart, Henrietta S Bada. Primary immunization of premature infants with gestational age<35 weeks: cardiorespiratory complications and C-reactive protein responses associated with administration of single and multiple separate vaccines simultaneously. J Pediatr. 2007 Aug ;151(2):167-72. Epub 2007 Jun 22. PMID: 17643770

Monday, April 14, 2014


Monday, April 7, 2014


Come Watch an Unforgettable Screening of the Documentary Film

The Truth about Fukushima Children

World Network for Saving Children from Radiation invites you to the FREE screening of

A2-B-C, followed by a Q&A discussion with three esteemed panelists.

Time: Tuesday April 29th, 6:15pm
Location: McManus Room @ Westport Library
20 Jesup Road, Westport, CT, 06880+

A2-B-C portrays the fierce, defiant love the mothers of Fukushima exhibit to protect their children

Could Fukushima happen in the US?

Are our own children safe from radiation exposure?

For inquiries contact: or (203) 347-5114

Watch the trailer of A2-B-C:

Watch CBS 60 minutes on Fukushima, Three years later: (broadcasted on April 7, 2014)


"Anecdotal" evidence clearly indicates that birth defects are on the rise in Hawaii and Washington state. It seems obvious -- at least to me -- that these birth defects correlate with radiation poisoning. Yet "experts" can't seem to put the pieces of the puzzle together and many residents are in complete denial as well. Why? Why are we refusing to look at The Truth? Shouldn't the "experts" be doing whatever they can to clean up the environment and warn parents about the dangers of radioactive poisons? How about teaching people how to detox their bodies and their soil from radioactive contamination?

The pain involved in giving birth to a child with birth defects is unmeasurable. And that pain is as much for the parents as it is for the child.

It's time for a revolution in this country. Since they are all refusing to do the right thing, all levels of government need to be extinguished.

Source Article by J. D. Heyes
Surge in babies born without brains in Washington State
"There is something seriously wrong in the fertile Yakima Valley region of Washington. A surging number of babies are being born with major birth defects, and the reasons why are eluding state health officials.

As reported by CNN, a nurse in the area, Sara Barron, was the first to report on a particularly horrifying condition: anencephaly -- a condition in which babies are born without much of their brain and skull.

"I was just stunned," she told the network in an interview. "Three in a couple-of-month period of time... that’s unheard of, and they have such tragic, terrible outcomes."

Her shocking finding and report eventually prompted an investigation by the state health department. Investigators found some disturbing results.

Over a three-year period, there were 23 cases concentrated in three southern Washington counties -- Yakima, Benton and Franklin. That’s a rate (8.4 per 10,000 live births) that is four times the national average (2.1 per 10,000 live births), CNN reported.

What could be causing such a phenomenon? Is it just one of those weird coincidences, or is something more sinister at play?

Mandy Stahre, with the Washington State Department of Health, conducted the investigation into the high rates of anencephaly. She says she and other investigators are stumped.

"We have not found an answer, and that’s a very frustrating part, because this is such a devastating diagnosis for a woman to have," she told CNN.

Barron, however, says she wonders if state health authorities did not find anything because they didn’t look hard enough at all possible causes.

’We have to weigh how invasive we want to be’

For one thing, she said, the health department has not spoken to any of the parents of the babies who had birth defects. So they don’t know what the parents may have eaten, or what environmental conditions they have been exposed to, or what kind of chemicals or substances they all might have come in contact with -- like, perhaps, the pesticides that are routinely sprayed in the heavily agricultural region in which they live.

Andrea Jackman, whose daughter Olivia was born with spina bifida, another type of neural tube defect, said she wasn’t asked anything by state investigators.

"Nobody’s asked me anything," she told the network.

So, exactly how did the state conduct its investigation? Stahre said investigators examined data in each parent’s medical record -- what sort of prescription drugs they were taking and preexisting medical conditions.

"The study examined medical records from January 2010 through January 2013 and looked at possible risk factors including family history, pre-pregnancy weight, health risk behaviors such as supplemental folic acid and medication use, and whether the woman’s residence received drinking water from a public or private source. No significant differences were found when comparing cases of anencephaly with healthy births in the three county area," said a health department press release.

"But medical records don’t have details about diet or pesticide exposure," CNN’s Elizabeth Cohen reported, "two key considerations for this type of birth defect."

Indeed, the health department -- in its press release -- even admitted: "Medical record reviews might not have captured all information, preventing a cause from being identified."

So why not talk to the mothers?

"Well, we have to weigh that," said Stahre. "This is a devastating diagnosis, and we know that for a lot of these women, they had to make some hard choices. We do have to weigh about how invasive we want to be with these types of reviews."

Engineered end of humanity?

At least one mother -- Jackman -- said she would have "been fine" with being questioned. She wants answers so that other mothers don't have to go through the same thing.

On the surface, this looks like yet another example of poisoning that Natural News editor and founder Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, wrote about recently when he said humanity doesn't stand a chance of surviving this onslaught of corporate-sponsored genocide:

After having now analyzed over 1,000 foods, superfoods, vitamins, junk foods and popular beverages for heavy metals and other substances at the Natural News Forensic Food Labs, I have arrived at a conclusion so alarming and urgent that it can only be stated bluntly.

Based on what I am seeing via atomic spectroscopy analysis of all the dietary substances people are consuming on a daily basis, I must now announce that the battle for humanity is nearly lost. The food supply appears to be intentionally designed to end human life rather than nourish it.

Read Mike's report here:

Watch video">here:
Mysterious cluster of birth defects stumps doctors

Via Shannon Rudolph

Aloha Governor, Legislators, Health & Ag Depts.

I wanted to pass on this update on one of the five Kaua'i infants, (that I know of, - plus two more on Maui) born with their intestines outside of their bodies. (gastroschisis) These babies will have to undergo many surgeries to correct the problem. Five of these cases are too many for a small island. Something is wrong - a state of emergency should be declared.

These young families have had to leave Hawai'i for care they can't get here. Alone in a strange land dealing with life threatening emergencies to their babies, with little family support - through no fault of their own.

You may want to look away and not believe it - but there are many credible studies linking this horrendous injustice that is happening on Kaua'i, right now... to atrazine and a witches brew of toxic chemicals sprayed on Kaua'i almost daily. And this is not even mentioning the many reports of seizures, birth defects, (THAT OUR HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAS FAILED TO TRACK for nearly ten years!) ...and the cancers.

This is just ONE true story of what our legislature is ALLOWING to happen. It's as sickening as it is insane. We are monsters - if we do nothing, and look the other way.

I can't begin to tell you how sad and angry this photo makes me feel. What is happening to the people of Kaua'i, (Molokai, Maui, & O'ahu) is inhumane.
Shame on us if we do not DEMAND some answers from our 'leaders'.

Hawai'i's Baby Arrow - after his fourth surgery/ report from daddy, below.

(Mama) Madison Strecker — with Chadry Keola Pa.
My hearts broken for my baby. He has endured so much in his little life. I'm so blessed to be Arrows mama, he is my hero.

via Chadry Keola Pa


ARROW IS A SOLDIER!!! His surgery was 5 hours long and his Atresia (constricted section of bowel) was removed!

He lost quite a bit of blood and so he did have to endure a blood transfusion which went well. He also had his appendix removed and so that is one less problem that we will have to deal with later.
He is heavily sedated and had a "G" tube placed into his abdomen as well. So hopefully he wont need the "G" tube for long as it is only in there as a precautionary in case he rejects the breast milk (which I really think he's not). And in that case can be removed very easily. I figure better to have one and not need one then need one and not have one. Because if say he did need one and was rejecting the food, it would be a major surgery putting one back in after all this surgery just went down. And I'm over cutting him up anymore!

He is on pain meds and a breathing tube as well. Breathing tube is temporary till his swelling comes down. Since he is so fresh out of surgery they don't want him moving around too much. The doctor said that if everything continues to go that way it has been, then we may be able to give him his first real meal next week Wednesday! We cant wait to start feeding him! Momma has milk for days!! Freezers full!

It's still too early to give a date on when we might come home. Its all depends on how his little stomach handles his food. One day at a time. Baby steps, Let the road to recovery begin!

Anywayz we ( Madison Strecker , Arrow, and I) just wanted to say thank you for all the prayers and Aloha that all of you have been sending our way! I really want to say and extra special Mahalo to the Desert Banner NICU team! All the nurses have been amazing and a real big Mahaloz to Dr. Greenfield for getting some good rest and performing an awesome surgery on my son!


Madison Strecker Arrow, and Chadry Keola Pa

Via Jay Duquette
"I know at least 2 babies on Maui in the last year that had the same thing. My friends doctor told them it was becoming more and more common."

Saturday, April 5, 2014


The US food supply is in deep trouble.

Source Article:
Fukushima Spring: 50% Genetic Damage found at Trader Joe’s

Perusing the floral section in the supermarket is usually the first thing on my grocery list these days. For the past 3 years I have documented genetic damage not only plants growing locally in SE Michigan, but in domestic and imported plants, fruits, and produce being sold to the public. Some of my best finds have come from items grown along the Pacific Coast, and this week a recent shipment of spring bouquets and potted plants at Trader Joe’s proved the same is still happening, as I suspected it would.

First, I comb through the bouquets, camera in hand. I look at the most obvious part of the plant, the flower head including petals and center. If I can spot a mutation, I check the stem and related leaves included. I look for color anomalies as well, as we know from past research mutations in color genes is another known effect of exposure.

During normal plant growth, the cells are self-organizing and grow in a symmetric pattern, following the Fibonacci Sequence of phyllotaxis. Phyllotaxis is the study of fractions and spirals in plants, which includes fruit and flower number, divergence angles, and petal numbers and formation. This pattern allows the plant to use the least amount of energy needed for amazingly rapid growth to maturity. Once the plant has reached it’s full potential, the perfect geometry of a plant allows it to absorb the sun’s rays and collect rainwater as efficiently as possible, channeling it to the stem for nourishment. Plato, Fibonacci, and Johanes Kepler all made contributions to the discovery and application of the Golden Ratio in nature. It appears in many aspects of our everyday world, including hurricanes, ram horns, spider webs, and snail shells, and even in the arrangement of our facial features. Also, take a look at our galaxy from above…we live in a Fibonacci Sequence. Our world is filled with many mysteries that scientists and mathematicians alike are working to figure out if this was just a coincidence, or something else. For whatever reason, it’s how normal plants grow, and it is also how we distinguish the normal from the mutated.

Damage to the DNA of the plant cells will disrupt this geometric growth pattern, leading to any number of mutational expressions such as conjoining, fasciation, gigantism, albinism, or other anomalies. These are known effects from decades of experimentation and research in areas of previous radioactive contamination, such as the areas around the Chernobyl accident and Three Mile Island.

After sorting through bouquets, I move on to the potted plants. Gerbera Daisies in the past have yielded a surprising number of mutations in flower heads, stems, and leaves, and this week was no different. I suspect this is because they are closely related to Sunflowers, or Helianthus annuus, which are notorious for their ability to remove radioactive Cesium from soil. This particular batch of Gerberas came from British Colombia, Canada. The domesticated cultivars are mostly a result of a cross between Gerbera jamesonii and another South African species Gerbera viridifolia. It is the fifth most used cut flower in the world (after rose, carnation, chrysanthemum, and tulip). It is also used as a model organism in studying flower formation. Out of 18 potted Gerbera’s on this particular day at Trader Joe’s, more than half of the plants had some obvious evidence of mutation in just the blooms alone. I would venture to bet that if walked into your local Trader Joe’s today and looked carefully at their Gerbera Daisies, that you would have similar findings. If you do, please takes some pictures and share them with us on our new Mutation Map Project. Their colorful beauty also makes them a favorite eye-catching post for people sharing mutation images on social media, and increasing the awareness of genetic damage that is occurring.

I also found mutations in one of my favorite flowers, the perennial desert Sun Star, or Ornithogalum Dubium (which I purchased, and which now sits on my desk). This particular batch was imported from Monrovia, California, where Trader Joe’s also receives much of its vegetables supply including lettuce, kale, celery, and asparagus. They also source these same items from Mexico, which is the only produce I will buy from their store. I would prefer to get mine from Chile or Argentina, but I would have to go to a different store for that, and on this particular day I didn’t have the time, as my main concern was securing a few bottles of their Salsa Verde, which happens to be phenomenal.

Nature does geometry precisely and efficiently and without much effort, unless genetic damage interferes with the expression of its growth patterns. Considering that Cesium and other man-made toxic isotopes have been found in US soil, including the Emerald Triangle of Humboldt County where large concentration of Medicinal Marijuana is grown, this is quite concerning not only for people sourcing and eating fresh produce from the west coast, but sick people who are using cannabis to treat severe medical conditions, including cancer.

Using the Precautionary Principle we can further surmise, if you actually care about what you eat and what you feed your family, that unless food is being specifically and rigorously tested for radioactive contamination, any food grown here must be considered suspect, and that is especially true if this food will be eaten by pregnant women, children, or people who are already sick and immune-compromised. As of right now, the only food being checked is by individuals and independent evaluation without any help from our government agencies, although this has always been the purpose of their existence. Instead, they have become gate-keepers of damaging corporate-controlled science, and the gates remain currently closed to evidence or concern about food chain contamination from radioactive fallout. Even a Canadian high school student was able to recently prove in an award-winning science fair project, that Canadian grocery stores are selling contaminated produce to unsuspecting consumers. She will be attending the Canadian Nationals next month in Windsor Ontario to showcase her research. This may become one of the most important high school science fair projects in history, considering the global implications of Fukushima Fallout in our food chain.

Over the past 3 years we have been collecting images of mutations in the news, as well as images taken by observant and curious volunteers. We have currently 1340 images in our archive, which will be placed on a map created at Climate Viewer News to track these finds, and more easily correlate their occurrence with weather patterns, and nuclear facilities across the country. In addition to plants we have received images of seeds, squirrels, moths, butterflies, pillbugs, spiders, and birds exhibiting color disruption (mainly albinism) and other curiosities. The images can also be saved and shared by scientists and grad students who undoubtably will be reporting on this as the years progress. At least 2 grad students have already sourced images from this collection to write their final thesis.

To access the map and upload images of your own, go here:

Currently I have placed one beta test image of a Purple Coneflower (Echinacea) with fasciation on the Mutation Map as an example. The rest of our archive will be uploaded in the coming weeks and months, as time allows.

We also encourage people to use their full name if they wish to receive credit if their image is used elsewhere, such as in a scientific journal, lecture, or publication. Out of 1340 submissions so far, only 2 people insisted on keeping their name private.

To see some of this collection you may also visit Mutation Watch on Facebook, which has been our current mode of collection. We will continue to administrate this page as well as the map, and encourage people to share these images on social media. Unfortunately the number of submissions during the growing season was in excess of 10 a day in 2013, and in the interest of time-management and helping keep RadChick’s sanity intact, Jim Lee volunteered to create this crowd-sourced data map to significantly decrease the amount of labelling and archiving that needs to be done, and to properly categorize the enormous amount of submissions in a format that is easily accessible. Please consider contributing news reports as well, such as the recent stories of conjoined grey whale calves in Baja, and news of the horrific rise in mutations occurring in babies born in South Africa.

Being a resident of Michigan after a long winter, the promise of warmer weather and springtime flowers is a welcome change, although these changes in our environment certainly are not. If mutations are happening in the DNA of plants, it’s happening in the people, too. For every mutation that is visible, there are 10 more that are not, but will express theselves in future generations. We continue to search for labs or individuals with the proper equipment to test these specimens, to determine whether this is primarily radioactive fallout, chemical interference, or a synergistic effect of both. But unless you have access to equipment priced at hundreds of thousands of dollars, accurate testing will be impossible. Even world-renowned animal and plant geneticists who have done extensive studies on the Chernobyl mutations have told me “Good luck getting these plants tested” as the quarantine of information on Fukushima Fallout has spread like a silent, unwanted plague, and government scientists seem to be most infected. Testing of individual specimens may or may not yield hard incontrovertible data, as the plant DNA may have been affected from gamma or beta radiation lying around in soil in close proximity to the plant, and not necessarily uptake into the plant structure itself. At any rate, we will keep collecting these images, and continue our search for mutations, as well as finding honest scientists that can assist us in figuring out what has happened to our biosphere to cause this, at what it means for future generations. This is one way to be part of the solution, as we search for ways to mitigate the radioactive fallout from the Fukushima accident, and other nuclear problems.

Here are more images of what I found at Trader Joe’s this week:

*Note from RC: I do not wish to single out Trader Joe’s as the sole source of selling mutated plants, as I have checked out numerous other grocery chains all with the same findings…mutated flowers being sold in stores is widespread, and has been confirmed by other researchers in multiple states and locations. However, I have had numerous conversations with the managers at Trader Joe’s including corporate management, and each time I have been met with contempt and disregard for trying to approach them on this subject, even when showing them obvious mutations in produce they are selling, such as celery and fruits, and radiation burns on apples from Washington State. The same has occurred when inquiring about the testing of fish and seaweed products, until fall of last year, when their rhetoric changed but appeared to be heavily censored. At that time, I was told Trader Joe’s is now testing all seafood products, and “Everything is fine”… although further questioning about how this was being conducted, at what part of the distribution process, and with what instrumentation could not be answered. Neither could any data by any type of isotopic analysis, which should be public knowledge in my opinion, or at least shared when specific inquiries are made. I have given them ample opportunity for addressing these issues and they continue to minimize and deny any and all concerns about the safety of the food they are selling in regards to this issue. In discussions with the management of other grocery chains I have been met with far more concern, and often a candid and honest discussion of how to implement widespread food testing without adding further to costs of food distribution. I know this is being thoroughly investigated at least at one large grocery chain, and I hope to see this (for now nameless) grocer implement widespread testing soon, and do so publically. In time, I expect this type of testing will become mandatory, as more people become aware of this situation and demand that it be done, because this issue is not going to go away in our lifetimes. Unfortunately we may be years away from that type of transparency, and the contamination issues have now been continuous since March of 2011. It also reasons to follow if any large chain implements a radiation testing protocol, that other stores will follow suit, as the competition in grocery chains is fierce in the effort to find, keep and maintain its consumer base.

Stay ahead of the rads on the RadChick Radiation Research and Mitigation page.

Please help us grow our Mutation Map ~ It is the first of its kind ever created, and will be an important future reference for scientists, geneticists, researchers, and inquisitive plant and planet-loving people alike. Eventually we hope to include mutation images from Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Rocketdyne/Simi Valley, and Hanford.