Monday, June 30, 2014


Source Article:
Oregon Burning Aborted Babies at Garbage Facility to Create Energy

A while back we told you about a disgusting practice that was taking place in Britain without broad public knowledge. The British version of Obamacare, the National Health Service (NHS), has surreptitiously been treating aborted children like simple garbage. The NHS had been sending miscarried and aborted babies to nearby waste to energy facilities where the bodies were incinerated right alongside common trash. The report that uncovered this travesty also found parents who’d lost their children early in pregnancy were not being treated with compassion by the NHS and their children’s remains were destroyed without consulting the parents.

One of Britain’s more important newspapers, The Telegraph, is reporting that some 15,000 aborted or miscarried babies were incinerated as “clinical waste.” Officials from Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) have admitted that thousands of children were incinerated with the garbage in a gross display of their disrespect for life.

The programme, which will air tonight, found that parents who lose children in early pregnancy were often treated without compassion and were not consulted about what they wanted to happen to the remains.

One of the country’s leading hospitals, Addenbrooke’s in Cambridge, incinerated 797 babies below 13 weeks gestation at their own ‘waste to energy’ plant. The mothers were told the remains had been ‘cremated.’

Another ‘waste to energy’ facility at Ipswich Hospital, operated by a private contractor, incinerated 1,101 foetal remains between 2011 and 2013.

They were brought in from another hospital before being burned, generating energy for the hospital site. Ipswich Hospital itself disposes of remains by cremation.

It was a disgusting story – from every angle. The only positive to take away was that this practice was not happening in the United States…

Sadly, there is no positive anymore. It seems that this disgusting practice is happening here in the US as well. A recent investigation by the B.C. Catholic has forced the British Columbia Health Ministry to admit that it sends the bodies of aborted babies alongside medical waste into the United States to be destroyed at waste to energy plants. These poor children are murdered and then their remains, instead of being treated with dignity and respect, are shipped to garbage facilities to be destroyed like so much trash.

The province’s Health Ministry said in an email to the B.C. Catholic that “biomedical waste” shipped to the U.S. to be incinerated includes “human tissue, such as surgically removed cancerous tissue, amputated limbs, and fetal tissue.”

“The ministry understands that some is transferred to Oregon. There it is incinerated in a waste-to-energy plant,” the email stated.

The ministry said that contractors handling the province’s “biomedical waste” follow “health and safety protocols, as well as federal, provincial, and local regulations.”

According to the state, the waste to energy facility in Oregon is still accepting waste from the Canadian hospitals – meaning that the bodies of dead children continue to be incinerated within our borders.

Bud Waterman, a former temp worker at Covanta Marion, Inc., said two to three times a week, 53-foot tractor trailers carrying biohazards dropped off loads at the facility in Brooks.

On more than one occasion, Waterman said the contents of the truck spilled out of their containers.

“It would make you sick, especially if you had to clean it up or have to pull a box off the trailer,” said Waterman. …

“They knew it, they had to. I don’t see how they could not know it,” said Waterman.


Waterman told KOIN that the facility had incinerated dead babies for years, in part because the Canadian government won’t dispose of fetal remains in this manner. That’s presumably why the BCHM sent the medical waste to Oregon in the first place.

The holocaust of abortion should be enough of a horror within our borders, and yet here we are compounding our national sin by showing no respect to these murdered children. Not to mention our active participation in the Canada’s own horrendous practices – now we have part in their murderous ways as well as our own. What have we come to?

Sunday, June 29, 2014


One of the main problems with science is that they forget to take into account that when they play around with these technologies, there are souls involved!!!! The creation of life should NEVER involve technology. Period. And I refer here not just to fertility technologies but also to every single aspect of what passes for prenatal "care" and birth support in the western world. Technology is the work of God's opposite. It is UNnatural and will always, every time, negatively effect us, and especially our consciousness.

These children are not just "embryos" and their parents are not just sperm and egg donors. These are lives we are talking about! And these lives are being created in an intensely artificial and cold way.

Any child that is conceived through in vitro fertilization will suffer because they are created in the absence of human love and in a context where science has tried to take the place of God. This is VERY dark technology. And of course the children will suffer. How could it be otherwise?

This is extremely sad.

Source Articles:

In Vitro Fallout - Donor IVF Teen Says I wish I Had Never Been Born

Donor IVF baby who says 'I wish I'd never been born': It's the great IVF taboo - how will a child feel about never knowing their biological parents? For this family, the answer was shattering
"...The reality is that we should have never made the “leftovers” to begin with. A couple of years ago the UK Embryo Authority released numbers that are shocking. From every one child born using IVF, as many as 30 embryos are created. We need to stop the mass production of human embryos just to boost success rates.

Gracie’s story is not just about the industrial mass manufacturing of human embryos. Her ordeal speaks directly to the use of donor eggs or sperm. Children conceived with donor gametes are purposely created to be denied half of their story and, like Gracie, they can keenly feel the loss of half of their identity.

Alana S. Newman, founder of and a donor-conceived adult, is bravely standing up for the rights of those intentionally denied what she believes is a fundamental right: the right to a relationship with one’s biological parents. She writes:

The facts of my conception are that my father was paid to abandon me. There is no dignity in that. I suffered from debilitating identity issues, mistrust of the opposite sex, hatred and condemnation of the opposite sex, feelings of objectification – like I only exist as a play – toy for others, and feeling like a science experiment.

If people can take away something so precious as a mother or father and make us feel like we should be grateful for the loss, what else can people take away from us? How do you expect the next generation to fight for things like freedom, democracy, clean air, clean water, when something as precious and basic as your mother or father is stolen from you? Removed by the state… Removed by a fertility industry that forces you into existence and then doesn’t return your calls when you grow up and start banging on their doors asking for records… Removed by a commissioning parent, often your other biological parent who vowed to protect and provide for you, but only on the contingency that you show gratitude for your life and don’t ask questions about the other missing parent….

It is truly time to start listening to voices of those like Gracie and Alana. The children of the wild west fertility industry are telling us that they aren’t just fine. The worst thing we can do is to tell them to “shut-up and be grateful for your life.” Instead we have to acknowledge their pain and reign in the “anything goes” attitude toward reproduction that prevails in our society..."

Read full article here

Thursday, June 26, 2014


I wonder if cytotec was used during this birth and whether it is responsible for killing this mom. C-section was done completely unnecessarily because baby was breech. And a life has been taken and lives have been harmed and this poor little baby will live without his mother and may even feel responsible for her death. How utterly said. A true tragedy.

BTW - cytotec is known to cause uterine rupture. The drug is killing women and babies around the globe and is being used not just off-label but AGAINST label, and should be banned.

Source Article:
Just hours after this photo was taken, happy new mum Lisa Parkisson was dead.

"This is a picture of 35-year-old Lisa Parkisson, minutes after giving birth to her son, Zac, via C-section.

The photo was taken in the early hours of Saturday morning at the Royal Oldham Hospital in the UK and Lisa was said to be “over the moon” with her beautiful new baby.

Just hours after this photo was taken, happy new mum Lisa Parkisson was dead.

But just two days later, Lisa’s family recieved a call that would change their lives. Lisa was dead.

Lisa had complained of a terrible headache in the hours following her son’s birth. But hospital staff put it down to her high blood pressure and there was no indication that anything else was physically wrong.

“She was so, so happy, the happiest we had ever seen her with Zac in her arms. She was beaming,” Lisa’s mum Judith told The Manchester Evening News. “She was saying ‘just look at him, he’s perfect. I will have that memory of her for the rest of my life and that will be a comfort to us.

“We want answers about what happened. She was a beautiful light, so funny, so warm, so kind and loved. And now that light has gone out,” Judith said.

Understandably this distraught family want to know how they’ve gone from joyously celebrating a new birth to grieving for their lost loved one and her boy, who will now grow up without a mum. This from The Daily Mail:

Ms Parkisson’s sister Ally Ziemniak, 40, said: ‘They said a midwife had gone into check at 8.30am and noticed something wasn’t right and they tried to resuscitate her but couldn’t.

‘She was in bed, there was blood everywhere, it was so terrible.’

Ms Parkisson went into labour on Friday evening and was admitted to hospital on Saturday, where staff found her baby was breech.

Lisa’s partner Chris told the Manchester Evening News: “I loved Lisa so much and she loved me. I am numb about what’s happened…. We will always talk about her to Zac, he will know everything about his mum.”

Baby Zac is reportedly still at the hospital while the family deal with the tragedy, but is doing well.

Our thoughts are with Lisa’s family at this terrible time."


To me, it is absolutely insane to give a woman chemotherapy drugs while she is pregnant. But to also then give her an unapproved, so-called "morning sickness drug" that is being used off-label (and maybe even AGAINST the label), is negligent and evil. The people responsible for causing so much needless suffering and POISONING of mothers and babies need to be held accountable. Financial payouts do not cut it.

And hey -- if you want the nausea to go away, how about you stop giving mom POISONOUS CHEMOTHERAPY DRUGS!!!

What a concept.

Source Article:
Birth defects blamed on unapproved morning sickness treatment

"Canadian women with severe morning sickness are being prescribed a powerful anti-nausea drug suspected of causing deformities in some babies, a Toronto Star investigation has found.

The drug, ondansetron, is approved by Health Canada to treat nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy and surgery patients. It is not approved to treat pregnant women, but some doctors prescribe it “off label” without hard proof it is safe for expectant mothers.

So little is known about how ondansetron affects pregnant women that the drug manufacturer says such use is “not recommended” for these vulnerable patients.

At least 20 Canadian women treated with ondansetron for vomiting in pregnancy experienced serious suspected side-effects, including two infant deaths and multiple cases of newborns with heart defects and kidney malformations, according to a Star analysis of 2012 records.

Curiously, information about these unapproved treatments is not publicly available from Health Canada.

The Star discovered this crucial information after analyzing a massive trove of data found in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s public side-effect report database.

This database holds thousands of publicly available records of side-effects suffered by Canadian patients. (Read more about what they reveal in tomorrow’s Star).

Ondansetron is just one of several powerful drugs being prescribed to Canadians for unapproved uses.

The controversial and common practice is known as an “off-label” use of a drug. Off label means a drug is used for a condition or age group for which it hasn’t been approved.

There is no law or regulation stopping doctors from prescribing drugs off label. And, the Star has found, they are doing so with little oversight.

There are innovative off-label uses of drugs that have helped patients, but many off-label prescriptions are written with no solid scientific proof that the drug will be safe or effective.

In 2012, a Senate committee told Health Canada officials it was concerned about whether the regulator was monitoring the effect of off-label prescriptions on vulnerable Canadians, especially pregnant women.

Yet Health Canada, which was criticized by the auditor general in 2011 for poor drug safety monitoring, says it has not reviewed these reported birth defects. The regulator has issued no warnings to prescribers or the public about pregnant women taking ondansetron for morning sickness.

Four of the Canadian babies featured in the FDA side-effect reports reviewed by the Star were born weighing as little as four-and-a-half pounds. In six cases, a suspected side-effect of ondansetron was listed as “fetal growth restriction.”

The Star looked at Canadian side-effect reports filed in the FDA database between 2010 and 2013. Each report is the opinion of the doctor, pharmacist or patient that a particular drug has caused a reaction. Patients’ names are taken out of the reports to protect their privacy.

All the ondansetron cases are from 2012. They include:
A baby born with a “musculoskeletal anomaly.”
A doctor reported that ondansetron was the suspected cause of a baby’s mouth deformity, jaundice, heart murmur and two heart defects, including “atrial septal defect,” otherwise known as a hole in the heart.

Because most women experience nausea and vomiting during the first trimester, they would be taking the drug at the same time the fetus is most vulnerable to developing malformations and deformities.

Roughly 10 to 15 per cent of pregnant women receive drugs to treat morning sickness, according to a recent U.S. study.

In the Canadian cases found in the FDA database, doctors prescribed ondansetron to treat “hyperemesis gravidarum,” an extreme form of morning sickness marked by relentless vomiting causing significant weight loss and dehydration. Left untreated, the condition puts both the mother and fetus at risk.

GlaxoSmithKline makes a brand-name version called Zofran and several other companies manufacture generics.

The Star contacted the companies mentioned in the side-effect reports.

Glaxo said “the safety of ondansetron for use in human pregnancy has not been established. . . . (The company) monitors and reports all adverse event reports . . . and works closely with regulatory authorities in Canada to include relevant safety information for physicians and patients within our product labels.”

Generic maker Mylan Inc. refused to comment. India-based Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals also declined to comment.

Last year, Ranbaxy USA pleaded guilty and paid a $130-million criminal fine, admitting it distributed adulterated drugs and made fraudulent statements to the FDA. Ondansetron was not one of the drugs named in the indictment, though Amir Attaran, a University of Ottawa law professor who has studied drug regulations, says Health Canada should not trust any products from the company.

On its website, Health Canada says Ranbaxy’s version of ondansetron is approved for sale.

The controversial use of ondansetron in pregnant women has been the subject of several studies in the last decade, with conflicting results and scientists from Toronto to Denmark saying more research is needed.

A 2011 study suggested the drug doubles the chance of babies being born with cleft palate.

Concerns about ondansetron’s safety were briefly placated after a study regarding the risk of adverse outcomes was published in the Feb. 28, 2013, issue of the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine.

The researchers tracked more than 600,000 Danish births using national birth and prescription registries, and found the drug was not associated with a significant increased risk of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth or defect.

But the same day the study was presented at a drug safety conference in Montreal, another group of Danish doctors introduced contradictory findingsbased on the same national registries.

Those researchers, looking at nearly 900,000 births, detected a two-fold increase in heart defects in babies whose mothers received ondansetron. They have since expanded the study to include more births and arrived at the same conclusion; they recently submitted their results to an academic journal, the lead researcher told the Star.

Medical practice guidelines, including those approved by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, urge caution, saying ondansetron should be used only after exhausting other medications that have been tested in pregnant women and are approved to treat morning sickness.

Meanwhile, confusion spreads among pregnant women.

On online message boards, some mothers readily recommend the drug to others, raving about how it quelled their nausea.

At the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, the Motherisk program, a leading source of information and advice for expectant mothers, gets several calls a week from women asking about their ondansetron prescriptions. In 2012, staff fielded 194 such calls.

Motherisk call takers and counsellors track these patients and their babies’ health but have little hard information about the drug to share with anxious mothers.

“Here is a drug not meant for pregnancy, given in pregnancy, with no data. So how do you know it’s safe for a baby? It’s an extrapolation that doctors do,” says Motherisk director Dr. Gideon Koren. “They think it’s the last chance for your patient. They think that there’s an edge for that drug compared to other drugs.”

For Christina Salvatori, ondansetron was the only drug that relieved her hyperemesis gravidarum. In late 2012, about four weeks into her pregnancy, she was crippled with violent vomiting.

Her symptoms were so severe she lost about 20 per cent of her body weight over the next two months. Salvatori spent 10 weeks of her pregnancy in hospital, six of them hooked up to a tube pumping 2,000 calories and nutrients into her each day.

“As all mothers, I wanted a drug-free pregnancy,” she said from her home in British Columbia. “When you’re in that state — you can’t sleep, you can’t eat, you can’t drink, you just physically can’t do anything — you know it’s not sustainable for your body or the baby. You have to take something.”

During an early hospitalization, doctors tried a battery of anti-nausea medications. Nothing worked until ondansetron.

Her husband researched the drug. The couple grew troubled about conflicting findings on its safety. She continued taking ondansetron right up to the day she gave birth to a healthy girl.

Ten months later, Salvatori said she would take ondansetron again. It was the only thing that got her through the pregnancy, she said.

But she said doctors and women should be cautious of using a drug with so much uncertainty surrounding its off-label use. She thinks Health Canada should track women like her. “If someone has to go on these medications, follow it and see what the effects are — monitor it.”

It is a drug regulator’s job to watch for signals that a drug may be harming the public.

Health Canada and other drug regulators began collecting side-effect reports in the 1960s in the wake of the thalidomide tragedy. The sedative, prescribed to treat the symptoms of morning sickness, caused thousands of serious birth malformations across the world.

Side-effect reports detailing cases of sick, vulnerable women taking a powerful drug and giving birth to babies with defects are a “signal that should be looked into,” Koren said.

Ondansetron is already on Health Canada’s radar: it has issued alerts concerning an increased risk of heart arrhythmias and possibly fatal reactions for patients on the drug for approved treatments.

The regulator, however, says there is no reason to probe the reported birth deformities.

“Currently, no emerging safety issues requiring further assessment related to ondansetron use in pregnant women have been identified,” a spokesperson said in a statement.

The Star found that Health Canada has not shared recent reports of birth defects showing women were given ondansetron to treat morning sickness. When pressed, Health Canada released some of this information to the Star, but has not released the information to the public.

“All the information should be provided by Health Canada in this database for the benefit of all the physicians who treat pregnant women,” said Mercedes Benegbi, executive director of Thalidomide Victims Association of Canada. “The only way to prevent a tragedy is the sharing of information.”

Doctors can learn of potential off-label uses of drugs from a range of sources, including published medical research and by word-of-mouth from other doctors.

It is illegal for drug companies to promote off-label uses to doctors.

In 2012, the U.S. Department of Justice reached a $3-billion settlement with GlaxoSmithKline after the government alleged the company promoted the off-label uses of several drugs, including Zofran, the company’s brand-name version of ondansetron.

Court documents alleged the company gave doctors kickbacks to prescribe the drug for morning sickness and disseminated false information about Zofran’s safety and effectiveness.

The company told the Star that as part of the settlement it admitted no wrongdoing “in connection with physician prescribing of Zofran in the U.S.”

North of the border, where Glaxo says its sales reps do not promote off-label uses of ondansetron or other products, Health Canada has never investigated or even asked the company about its ondansetron sales practices.

Jesse McLean can be reached at or 416-869-4147.

David Bruser can be reached at or 416-869-4282."

Saturday, June 21, 2014


Source Article by Paul Fassa
The breast cancer link to bras

(NaturalNews) The birth of feminism in the late 1960s and early 1970s featured young women burning bras as a counterpoint to young men burning their draft cards. Bra burning was a social statement. Now there's more discussion regarding the medical merits of those demonstrations.

Ironically, it was an American woman who invented the bra around the turn of the 20th century, according to Ken L. Smith, a health educator and Breast Health Facilitator for the American Cancer Society.

Up until the beginning of the 20th century, corsets were what made women exhibit that desired hourglass figure and inadvertently pushed up the bust line for fashionable clothing of that time. The problem was, corsets messed with internal organs while shaping those hourglass figures, and their tightness resulted in women fainting easily and often.

The birth of the bra

In 1893, Marie Tucek made a "breast supporter" that looked like a modern brassiere. But, later, Mary Phelps Jacobs designed a better version and called it a brassiere. She patented it and sold the patent to a company named Warner Brothers Corset Company in Bridgeport, Connecticut, for $1,500. It caught on.

By the 1950s, teenage girls were urged to buy and use training bras to hold their breasts firmly in a desirable way and prevent sagging. But even the brassier industry admits that the only time bras prevent sagging is while wearing them.

Ken Smith suggests that using artificial breast support long enough will cause the breasts' cup-shaped suspensory Cooper's ligaments to atrophy, allowing the breasts to sag over time anyway. Exercises that strengthen pectoral muscles can be helpful.

It's recommended to use a one-piece sports bra for exercising. Some women use one-piece sports bras as a healthier alternative to regular bras when not exercising.

Bras and breast health

The connection between wearing bras and painful and bothersome non-malignant breast fibrocystic disease as well as malignant breast cancer was hardly mentioned until the book Dressed to Kill by researchers Sydney Ross Singer and Soma Grismaijer came out in 1995.

They surveyed 5,000 women and discovered that women who wore bras for 12 hours or more greatly increased breast cancer risk compared to women who wore bras less.

Dr. Gregory Heigh of Florida has found that over 90% of women with fibrocystic breast disease find improvement when they stop wearing their brassieres. There are case testimonies (source below) from breast fibrocystic disorder patients who realized this when they stopped or at least lessened brassiere use.

The connection between breast tumors, non-malignant or malignant, and bras has merit when considering the lymph drainage issues from wearing bras too often. The lymph system, which includes lymph nodes in the breasts, requires body movement to pump out the lymph nodes' accumulation of toxic waste materials. That's what bouncing on a rebounder is about.

Not only are breasts' movements inhibited by bras, thus restricting proper lymph node draining, but the tight enclosures of bras constrict the breasts and constrict lymph material flow.

If a Florida doctor has observed 90% healing from fibrocystic breast disorders upon not wearing bras, with many other women offering testimonies with positive results on their bra abstinence, it follows that wearing bras less or not at all helps prevent breast cancer.

Sources for this article include:

Case histories of fibrocystic relief upon ditching or easing bra use:"


I find this video very upsetting. And the idiotic comments about "how precious" this is really disturb me. Please watch (under 2 minutes) and see for yourself. And as you watch, please note how desperately this baby tries to cling to its mother, despite the fact that mother is completely unresponsive to the baby. This is a mother who "delivered" via cesarean surgery. She is incapacitated, both mentally and physically. The baby clings desperately to her face as he/she recognizes that this is "mother" by her smell. In this case, "mother" cannot behave like a mother. Because of the drugs, she is perhaps paralyzed. And she is not in her right mind. So the bond between mother and child will be FOREVER undermined. And the imprinted memory for this child will include terror about why mother is not responding and whether she might be dead. There might also be the feeling that mom will never be able to respond to the child's needs and will not be there to protect him/her either. This is extremely, extremely sad. Naturally, medical personnel are going against their own humanity in taking this child away from its mother and they, too, will suffer immense spiritual harm from their wrongdoing. It's a fucking nightmare really. And it happens every single day to thousands (or perhaps millions) of children around the world. And we wonder why humanity is so screwed up.

the most beautiful miracle

Source Article:
Newborn Clinging To Mother's Face After Birth Epitomizes The Bond Between Mother And Child

The indestructible bond between mother and baby has just appeared in a video.

In a clip that surfaced on YouTube last week, a newborn clings to his mother's face shortly after birth. The infant refuses to let go and protests loudly and definitely when a hospital worker tries to pull the baby away.

The new mother appears to have just given birth via caesarean section, and the attendant seems to be holding the newborn near the mother's face so she can see her child for the first time -- and feel the first embrace. In keeping with most hospital procedure, the baby will likely be whisked away for evaluation.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014


Anyone that can look at this picture without feeling discomfort is not fully human. It is plain to see that this incredibly vulnerable infant is being TORTURED. Notice the tubes down this baby's throat and that they have cut a whole in his/her abdomen (likely done without anesthesia since doctors are taught that babies cannot feel pain) in order to insert yet another tube. Notice that the child has been placed in the position of a crucifixion and note that this poor baby has probably been PARALYZED so that he/she cannot move -- but can feel everything that the medical sadists are doing to her/him. Notice that this article describes a very sadistic form of "research" during which this helpless infant (and 1,315 other infants) was deliberately, methodically, and purposefully denied oxygen so that these psychopaths could study the effects -- and that this was a government-funded study that took place at 23 DIFFERENT ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS, INCLUDING WAKE FOREST AND YALE UNIVERSITY -- HOME TO THE SATANIC ORDER OF SKULL & BONES. Notice the slimy and disgusting faces of the doctors who carried out and defend this sadistic, satanic-based, scientific activity.

The article makes it sound like the issue concerns whether the parents were properly informed. But the real issue concerns the fact that evil people, under the guise of scientific and medical research, are deliberately torturing and murdering infants. When do we say enough?

Source Article:
Full Disclosure: Did Government’s Experiment on Preemies Hide Risks?

Just 25 weeks into her pregnancy, Sharrissa Cook gave birth to a critically ill baby boy. Dreshan weighed in at a fragile 1 pound, 11 ounces. He lay motionless in the incubator, connected to tubes and monitors in the neonatal intensive care unit at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital.

“He was so tiny,” Cook recalls. “I was a first-time mom. I didn’t have a clue. I didn’t know what to expect.”

It was Oct. 11, 2006. Medical personnel asked Cook, then a 26-year-old single mother, to enroll little Dreshan in a study. She says they described it as a program offering assistance and encouragement to preemies—premature babies—and their families. She readily signed the consent form.

“I remember them telling me they were a support group who would pretty much hold my hand through the developmental process,” Cook says.

But in reality, the study was much more than that. It was a national, government-funded experiment on 1,316 extremely premature infants in which their fate may as well have rested with the flip of a coin.

Other single moms who were among those persuaded to sign up their critically ill babies at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital describe similar misunderstandings of the study’s purpose.

Bernita Lewis, then a 22-year-old student, says she enrolled her premature newborn, Christian, after medical personnel told her it simply was to gather data such as weight and height.

And Survonda Banks, then 21, unemployed and on public assistance, says someone handed her the consent form on her way in for an emergency C-section at 28 weeks of pregnancy. Banks remembers being told only that it was a way to help her baby, Destiny.

‘Parents Were Misled’

The government-backed study is called SUPPORT, which stands for “Surfactant, Positive Airway Pressure, and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial.” The experiment was conducted at 23 academic institutions from 2005 through 2009 under the National Institutes of Health, part of the Department of Health and Human Services.

All three women now say they never would have agreed to take part if they had known the NIH-funded study’s true nature—to randomly manipulate preemie oxygen levels. They discovered that just last year.

Dreshan and Christian are now 7 years old and both struggle with myriad health problems. Destiny died within three weeks. The mothers wonder: Did the experiment contribute to any of the medical problems of their children?

“[Dreshan] was already at a slim chance of surviving; why would I make his chances of surviving more slim?” Cook asks.

‘Didn’t have clue’: Sharrissa Cook and her father, Julius.

Today, nine months after the federal government convened a public meeting to examine the subject, NIH and HHS officials have yet to propose a remedy to avoid a repeat of the controversy that erupted from the multiyear study.

“The word ‘unethical’ doesn’t even begin to describe the egregious and shocking deficiencies in the informed-consent process for this study,” says Dr. Michael Carome, an internationally recognized expert on research ethics with the Washington, D.C.-based consumer watchdog group Public Citizen.

“Parents of the infants who were enrolled in this study were misled about its purpose,” Carome says. “They were misled to believe everything being done was in the ‘standard of care’ and therefore posed no predictable risk to the babies.”

Although federal officials repeatedly said the government didn’t know how much the SUPPORT study cost taxpayers, a Freedom of Information Act request netted internal documents that show the figure is $20.8 million.

Dr. Waldemar Carlo, director of the neonatology division at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, lead site for the study, denies wrongdoing on behalf of the approximately two-dozen institutions that took part—including Wake Forest and Yale Universities.

In a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine in May 2013, Carlo (at right) wrote: “Our consent forms were conscientiously drafted according to the Code of Federal Regulations and were based on the best available evidence.”

Dr. Robert Califf, vice chancellor for clinical research at Duke University School of Medicine, which also took part in the experiment, urges observers to dial back the rhetoric. “Sensational claims of calling people unethical, I think, really detract from the serious discussion that needs to occur,” Califf (below right) says.

The Oxygen Dilemma

Doctors say babies are at risk of complications even when born at 37 weeks, now considered early term. The stated goal of SUPPORT was to identify the best oxygen level for extremely preterm infants—generally those born before 25 weeks, and so especially in distress.

Medical personnel routinely give supplemental oxygen to babies who are born with immature lungs. Too much oxygen can cause severe eye damage, including a blood vessel disease and blindness called retinopathy. Too little oxygen can lead to brain damage and death.

The NIH-funded experiment used the test babies in an attempt to find the sweet spot for preemies yet to be born: the lowest level of oxygen that would preserve vision, yet be sufficient to prevent brain damage and death.

To get the answer, researchers arbitrarily assigned infants to either a high-oxygen or low-oxygen group. Because, researchers say, all oxygen levels fell within the generally accepted range, they argue the babies received the same “standard of care” as babies not in the study. None of the consent forms mentioned a risk of death from the oxygen experiment.

But it turns out there were key differences in how researchers treated babies in the study compared with those not in the study.

Normally, medical personnel constantly adjust oxygen as preemies’ conditions change, based on their individual needs. But the SUPPORT study was designed to keep infants in their randomly assigned range, despite a baby’s individual needs.

And in a decision that one government source says shocked seasoned researchers when they learned of it, the babies’ oxygen monitors intentionally were altered to provide false readings. The reason: so medical staff wouldn’t be tempted to adjust oxygen out of the babies’ study-assigned range.

“Nothing in the consent form explained the falsely reading oxygen monitors could lead to adverse decisions about care of the babies,” Carome, who directs Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, says in an interview. He calls both the study design and consent form unethical.

‘Playing Russian roulette

In some instances, the results proved both disturbing and tragic.

More of the high-oxygen babies ended up with serious vision disorders. The low-oxygen preemies were more likely to die. The results, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May 2010, sparked ethical questions and complaints. Companion studies being conducted in other countries were halted.

Dreshan, born 20 days before Halloween in 2006, faced scary health issues. (Photo: courtesy Sharrissa Cook)
[Scary health issues???? How about the fact that this baby was being deliberately tortured by psychopaths??] -- Jeanice's comment

Of learning her baby had been part of an oxygen experiment, Sharrissa Cook says: “That’s more like playing Russian roulette to me. There’s no way I would say you could give my baby whatever you want him to have as opposed to what he needs.”

Four years after the SUPPORT study was published, it is the subject of heated scientific and ethical debates about the balance between the need to recruit human research subjects and the responsibility of researchers to fully disclose all risks to test subjects or their guardians.

Both sides agree the outcome stands to affect the way scientists conduct experiments on humans.

And now, Public Citizen and nine prominent scholars in bioethics, law, and history are calling on the HHS Office of Inspector General to step in. On May 20, they went public with charges that senior NIH and HHS officials engaged in serious misconduct by interfering with an ethics office in HHS as it investigates the experiment on preemies.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., joined the call for the HHS inspector general to determine whether officials “compromised the integrity and independence” of the ethics probe.

“The most troubling part is that numerous high-ranking officials facilitated this interference by senior NIH officials,” Carome said, “despite the fact that NIH had obvious actual, direct conflicts of interest in the research under investigation.”


Source Article:
European royals killing naked children for fun at human hunting parties

This is one in a series of articles taken from eyewitness testimony before the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels. Five international judges are examining evidence of child rape, torture, murder and kidnapping allegedly done by global elite members of the Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult network. Regular Ninth Circle child sacrifices were said to take place in the catacombs of Catholic Cathedrals, the Vatican, on private estates and groves and government military bases in Belgium, Holland, Spain, Australia, Ireland, France, England and the US. At least 34 child mass grave sites were identified in Ireland, Spain and Canada – and refused excavation by the respective governments, Crown of England and Catholic Church. Named as present in Ninth Circle activities were Pope Francis, former Pope Ratzinger;Anglican, United Church of Canada and Catholic Church officials including Cardinals; members of European royalty including Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip; officials of the Canadian, Australian, UK and US military and governments including the USA’s CIA, plus prominent government ministers, judges, politicians and businessmen from the US, Belgium, Holland, Canada, Australia, France, Ireland and the UK.

Teens were drugged, stripped naked, raped, hunted down in the woods and killed by European royals according to this week’s latest eyewitness to testify before the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels. The woman was the fourth eyewitness to give accounts about these human hunting parties of the global elite Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult network. A former member of the Netherlands criminal drug syndicate known as Octopus testified that victims were obtained for these human hunting parties from juvenile detention centers in Belgium and Holland.

“In 2004 I was an involuntary witness to torture, rape and murder sessions of drugged children performed for a group of high ranked people of the Netherlands” stated a woman. “I was taken to a hunting party in Belgium close to Brussels where I saw two boys and a girl ages 14 to 16, hunted and killed by global elites. The human hunting party was heavily guarded by the Netherlands Royal Guards. I was told that King Albert of Belgium was present.”

Four eyewitnesses confirmed that as children and youths they were forced to attend human hunting parties where they and other children were raped, with some killed, and deceased boy’s penises were cut off. Allegedly there was a Dutch countryside palace where boys’ penises were displayed like trophies on a wall. Some hunting parties were hosted on the grounds of Belgium Queen Beatrix’s Palace.

Dutch therapist Toos Nijenhuis claimed that as a four year-old she was forced to witness murders of children that involved former Pope Ratzinger, a Dutch Catholic Cardinal, plus the father of Netherlands Belgium Queen Beatrix and Bilderberger Founder, Dutch Crown Prince Alfrink Bernhard. “I saw the former Pope Joseph Ratzinger murder a little girl″ another witness confirmed. “It was at a French chateau in the fall of 1987. It was ugly, horrible and didn’t happen just once. Ratzinger and Bernhard were some of the more prominent men who took part.”

In Ireland, Spain and Canada 34 child mass grave sites were discovered and appeared linked to Ninth Circle activities. The largest was the Mohawk Indian Residential School in Brantford Ontario where child remains were identified in 2008 before the Catholic Church, Canadian government and English Crown shut down the dig by professional archeologists. The 2013 ICLCJ Court had found Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip guilty for the Oct. 10 1964 disappearance of ten native children from the Catholic residential school in Kamloops British Columbia. In the first two weeks of the 2014 court witnesses identified Dutch and Belgian royal participants in the rape and killing of Mohawk children and newborns. Named were Bernhard and King Hendrick, consort to Queen Wilhelmina of Holland.

Alleged to be present during the human hunting parties were the late Prince Johan Friso and his wife Mabel Wisse Smit, former ministers, the top man of the Dutch army, the under secretary of the Raad Van State in the Netherlands, the Vice-Roy next to Queen Beatrix and other global business and political leaders including some from the US. “Surely the present King Willem Alexander and King Filip and their wives know about this abuse and murder of children” said one eyewitness.”They do nothing about it and likely are the ones to stop investigations and prosecutions.”

In January 2014 the brother of the king of Holland Prince Johan Friso passed away in a coma after these three Dutch-language websites shown here reached the internet. The websites revealed that Friso was at the human hunting and killing parties.”The story came on the internet after years of trying to move the policy and justice department in the Netherlands to act against the criminals,” an eyewitness said. “Nobody did anything to stop these criminals, probably because Queen Beatrix and King Albert likely interfered with the investigations.”

Human hunting parties were said to take place on the grounds of Belgium Queen Beatrix’s Palace in the Netherlands. Two witnesses have named former Pope Joseph Ratzinger and Queen Beatrix’s father the deceased Prince Alfrink Bernhard, as being present at child sacrifices. Both were said to be Nazi sympathizers.

The ICLCJ Court received a collection of Jesuit archival records about a child sacrificial cult known as the Knights of Darkness. In 1933 the Knights were established by the Catholic Jesuits and Nazi Waffen S.S. Division. The records showed Ratzinger was identified as a member of the Knights while working as an S.S. Chaplain’s assistant at the Ravensbruck Concentration Camp in Germany. The records also stated that Ratzinger participated in child sacrificial rites using kidnapped children from the camps or political prisoners.

Another court document called the Magisterial Privilege indicated child sacrifice was a regular occurrence at the Vatican. At the tender age of 12 “Svali” of San Diego County California claimed she was brought to catacombs beneath the Vatican to witness the sacrifice of a three year-old drugged boy. In this video her interviewer said that 24 years prior a “Maria” told him she witnessed another satanic child sacrifice rite in the same Vatican Catacombs.

Last week an Irish police investigator reported to the ICLCJ Court that the close to 800 babies buried in a Catholic Nun’s septic tank were dismembered, decapitated and in bits and pieces – signs that they could have been murdered in Satanic child sacrifice rites. In the last two months the ICLCJ Court has heard these heart-wrenching testimonies about the rape, torture and murder of children as recently as 2010 by Catholic leaders, European royal family members and other global elites. Murder sites of the Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult were said to be in the catacombs of Catholic Cathedrals including the Vatican and on private estates, military establishments and groves in Belgium, Holland, Spain, Australia, France, England and the US.

The ICLCJ Court has been overwhelmed with newly discovered evidence and a number of new witnesses coming forward to testify about Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult activities. They have uncovered Ninth Circle Satanic Cult member possible involvement in international child sacrifice, kidnapping, exploitation and drug rings. The five international judges and 27 jury members were expected to remain in session for at least a year due to the complexity of the cases.

Amnesty has been offered to citizens or employees of the Vatican, Crown of England, churches or governments willing to give sworn testimony or evidence that leads to the prosecution of these global elites suspected of committing crimes. Rewards up to 10,000 euros or around 13,660 dollars was available through the ICLCJ court.

The ICLCJ Court had over 450 Common Law Peace Officers in 13 countries, with 51 local chartered groups operating. Local organizing funds were available for common law groups that applied through the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State. To contact officers of the court or ITCCS Field Secretary Kevin Annett, email or call:,,,, 250-591-4573 (Canada), or 386-323-5774 (USA)"


The west coast of the United States and the Pacific Ocean are in serious trouble. Anchovies dying en masse. Starfish by the millions melting into piles of goo. Babies being born with thyroid conditions and half a brain -- or no brain at all. Every tuna tested coming up radioactive.

If we do not step up and deal with the evil behind this, it will consume the entire planet. It is up to us to say NO to the dark forces' presence in our world. We must INTEND for these forces to be EXTINGUISHED AND BANISHED from every corner of this universe and throughout all time and space. We must relegate these luciferian-created forces to the furthest corners of the furthest universe where they can only interact with each other -- and never interfere with any person or place or any level of existence ever again. IT IS THROUGH OUR INTENTION THAT WE WILL FORCE THEM TO LEAVE. AND WE HAD BETTER GET ON THIS NOW. WE HAVE BEEN COWARDLY, LAZY, AND TOO WILLING TO ACQUIESCE! How much destruction are we willing to accept before we will take a stand and come together to eliminate these fuckers? Will you allow them to take your children? Perhaps you already have. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!! WAKE UP!!!

Via Troy Livingston - Facebook

Pelicans dying off at record numbers but what isn't around the pacific thanks to fukushima? The biggest die offs over seen have already taken place truly a extinction level event in slow-motion.

Professor: Just 1% of usual number of baby California pelicans; “Nearly complete failure to breed”; Only 20 newborns in area where 10,000 expected — Expert: ‘Flabbergasted’ by what’s happening in Malibu, “I’ve never seen anything like that”

California pelicans fail to mate, animals dying 'like a horror show' - is Fukushima to blame?

"(NaturalNews) The "fun in the sun" lifestyle that Southern California is known for apparently no longer applies to the region's seabirds, many of which are disappearing at an alarming rate. New reports indicate that the vast majority of California pelicans have simply stopped reproducing, with less than 1 percent of the usual number of baby pelicans turning up for the season.

Between 80 and 90 percent of Southern California's brown pelicans hail from Mexico's Baja Peninsula, which abuts California's southern border. The birds typically breed here in the tens of thousands and travel north, making their homes along the coast. But this year, very few baby pelicans emerged from the peninsula, a phenomenon that seasoned professor Dan Anderson says is unusual.

"It's been almost a nearly complete failure to breed, which is quite unusual actually," stated the instructor from the University of California at Davis to 89.3 KPCC. "At one island that we study, Isla Salvatierra, which would normally have 8,000-10,000 young, only had like 20 young," he added.

Unsure as to what might be causing this lack of reproduction, some are speculating that depleted fish food sources, which include small fish like sardines and anchovies, may be responsible. Other areas where adult pelicans are actually swarming in higher-than-normal numbers reveal that many of them are just hanging out rather than nesting or rearing young, lending credence to this hypothesis.

Pelicans are known to populate many of the areas around the Salton Sea, for instance, after other smaller birds have had the chance to nest and move on. But this year, adult pelicans moved in early and took over, without reproducing. Thousands of non-reproducing adult pelicans have also swarmed the Malibu Lagoon area north of Los Angeles.

"I was just sort of flabbergasted at seeing 3,500 brown pelicans resting in Malibu Lagoon," stated Dan Cooper, a biologist who monitors birds in the region, to 89.3 KPCC. "I checked my notes, and I have numbers in the hundreds, but I've never seen anything like that."

Massive fish kills linked to Fukushima could be harming pelican reproduction

One explanation for the earlier-than-normal migration patterns of pelicans, as well as their lack of reproduction, is the potential for an El Nino climate event. El Nino is the name given to unusually warm ocean temperatures that occur in the Pacific every few years.

"This was the first time that a major El Nino event could be directly tied to these massive breeding failures," stated Kimball Garrett, an ornithology collections manager at the Natural History Museum, to reporters. "It's become clear that this can happen in many areas and not just that little narrow area along the equator."

Another possibility is the dreaded Fukushima disaster, which may have been linked to numerous mass die-offs of ocean fish that occurred along the California coast over the past several years. Just a few weeks ago, in fact, tens of thousands of dead fish washed up in the Marina del Rey harbor, the second time such an event has occurred in the area since 2011.

These fish would normally have been food for hungry pelicans.

"It's horrible," stated area resident Lisa Lascody to KTLA 5 Local News about the more recent discovery of the dead fish. "There's like a million dead anchovies floating around, as well as other fish. It's creepy and weird."

Sources for this article include:"

Tuesday, June 17, 2014


Science is a cover for satanic ritual abuse and torture and other nasty works coming from the dark side.

Source Article:
The Children of Table 34

"Science was a cover for pedophilia predation and for teaching and encouraging predation as a positive, “healthy” alternative form of adult-child “love” – even as Kinsey himself defined these acts as causing children to scream, convulse, faint, and respond with violence.

Somehow no one in our American courts, media, or other academic institutions noticed that there was no reporting on the children afterward.

What’s more, when sex and pain are fused together in the brain at a young age, sometimes the powerful sex drive for the rest of one’s life triggers a corresponding requirement for pain, creating another potential sadomasochist, who can meet their needs most easily with more children. The behavior is repeated through the generations, increasing in numbers. (Those who don’t fuse their pain and sex brain patterns may often split their minds instead, creating a different dysfunctional problem.)...

How or Where are the children today? I offer two theories.

The first is that someone noticed that the traumatized children soon became dissociative (“multiple personalities”) and switched “alters” (alternate personalities) when faced with the trauma of adult-forced sex, which allowed them to be used very easily from that point on – and some were funneled conveniently into mind control projects.

(The US government’s MKULTRA project began just three years after Kinsey’s research began.)

Second, it’s quite possible that the dissociation wasn’t discovered, but had been well understood as a result of young sexual trauma and was the intention..."

Read full article here

ALFRED KINSEY - Kinsey syndrome- Warning Disturbing Adult content

"Of children, he said 100% are orgasmic from birth, therefore
- Children can benefit from sex with adults and even incest.
- Children need early, explicit, school sex education since they're sexual from birth.
- Children need masturbation and hetero and homosexual acts to be taught to them.

Part of Kinsey's defense of pedophiles was that children were not really harmed by sexual contact with adults, therefore it made no sense to incarcerate pedophiles for lengthy prison terms...

1950 - As Reisman noted, the Modern Penal Code was financed by the Rockefeller Foundation. Not coincidentally, the Rockefeller Foundation also financed the research of Alfred Kinsey...

The late Norman Dodd was the director of research for the Reese Committee. In an interview recorded shortly before his death, Dodd stated that part of what the Committee had learned was that the objective of the great foundations was to remove America from the values on which she was built and to do so through the education system.

'What we had uncovered was the determination of these large endowed foundations -- this Carnegie endowment story, and the Ford Foundation and the Guggenhiem and the Rockefeller Foundation all working in harmony toward the control of education in the United States...'

According to the Reese Committee, the postmodern thinking in America today is no mere accident but has been intentionally created by the elite foundations as part of a greater agenda...

Kinsey defined orgasm for pre-adolescent children with the following description... 'A gradual, and sometimes prolonged, build-up to orgasm which involves still more violent convulsions of the whole body.. heavy breathing, groaning, sobbing, or more violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears (especially among younger children)...'

[Kinsey] had six categories.... of orgasm.... and included in these categories of what he calls an orgasm were screaming, writhing in pain, hysterics (especially among younger children). He said that the children had convulsions... He said they fainted. He said they struck the partner... this is the man who's raping the child -- they struck the partner and tried to get away... and he said that those were all examples for him of orgasm...

Kinsey made it clear that this data was supplied by adult observers who were defined as pedophiles by Kinsey's own team members... Kinsey wrote '...some males suffer excruciating pain and may scream... The males in the present group -- by which he meant pre-adolescent boys -- become similarly hypersensitive before the arrival of actual orgasm, will fight away from the partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax... although, he said, they derive definite pleasure from the situation.'...

Kinsey's own sadomasochistic tendencies have been documented by a number of biographers. James Jones revealed that Kinsey once climbed into a bathtub and circumcised himself with a pocket knife without the benefit of anesthesia. Another account of Kinsey's extreme self-abuse came about when his research was under investigation. Jones reports that after the Rockefeller Foundation withdrew his funding, Kinsey went to a basement, tied one end of a rope to an exposed ceiling pipe and the other end around his scrotum... then stood on a chair and jumped off...

Some have considered the possibility that Aleister Crowley was another of Kinsey's pedophiles who kept his diaries as part of Kinsey's sex research. 'I would be surprised if Kinsey were not, in fact, either paying or communicating with Crowley regarding his sex diaries because Crowley was more open and more public with his sexual exploits than pretty much anybody at the time. He was known as the wickedest man on the Earth long before Kinsey would have gone to him. He was far more accessible than, say, a Nazi officer in Germany to Kinsey and... at the same time, Crowley could have used the money. In the 1940s, he wasn't as rich... and so he would have been more open to that. And then to see that Kinsey was actually reading Crowley's stuff -- we know that from Pomeroy -- it would be hard to believe that he wasn't already working with Crowley and encouraging Crowley to continue on with his sexual exploits. One way or another, the net effect is the same. Kinsey was fostering much of the same revolution that Crowley had begun over in England and was helping continue what Crowley hoped would take place in the United States of America.

[Regarding the soft porn industry that was emerging and citing Kinsey's work as their foundation, Dr. Judith Reisman said]...You're going to have to have an increase in sexual crimes by children against children and by adults against children. You cannot do the kind of programming of people's brains, minds, memories, bodies -- the connection between the brain goes all the way down from the retina all the way down the central nervous system and into genitals -- you can't show people those kind of pictures and arouse them that way and not think that they're going to act out either positively on somebody who agrees or negatively on somebody who doesn't agree. That's what's going to happen. And you simply can't do that to billions of people at one time -- to masses of the population.

In her Department of Justice study, Dr. Reisman revealed that from 1953 to 1982, Playboy, and eventually Penthouse and Hustler magazines, had published approximately 9,000 images of children involved in sexual scenarios -- an average of about 8-9 images per issue.

'And I showed the development of the child in those images -- in cartoons, in photographs, in the use of the child as a sexual object by the observer, the viewer, and I said -- your average guy thinks he's buying a girlie magazine -- you know a magazine that's just pictures of pretty girls -- and he has no idea that the messages that are being pumped into him neurophysiologically if you will -- all the way down and through his system -- include images of the sexual assault of children. He as the viewer becomes the predator. That's just the way the human brain works...

There was never any science in all of this. It's got nothing to do with science. It's always been political. It's all been people's own sexual perversions that have driven them. And now that drives those sexual perversions into the school in the form of sex education curriculum...

Dr. Reisman has, for years, argued against the harmful impact of the sex industry on America's children. Many of the Phds who teach in our universities have not only been associated with the Journal of Pedophilia but have also served as board members for pornographic magazines like Penthouse Forum. These are the people who have designed the programs for sex education in America. Because Kinsey chose to define the pain and suffering of abused children as orgasm, he then argued that children were sexual from birth and should be taught about having sex as soon a possible. While most who promote the programs probably don't know it, this thinking is what lies behind the idea of teaching sex education to kindergartners...

Consider again this image of a teacher showing what appears to be 6 and 7-year-old girls how to use a condom. Who will this 7-year-old be using a condom with? When you consider that the Phds who have designed these programs openly support the pedophile philosophy, we can only wonder -- is sex education really intended to protect America's children? -- Or to condition them for seduction at the hands of a child molester."

Saturday, June 14, 2014


Awaken all good people of the world! Learn The Truth about the demonic apartheid state called Israel. Evil resides there.

Thursday, June 12, 2014


The United States is moving rapidly into a fascist police state and the medical system is a fundamental part of the control system. Hospitals are EVIL!!! Never, ever go to a hospital unless it is urgently necessary to save a life. There is so much mean-spirited, demonic energy in these hell-holes that just stepping foot into a hospital can destroy your life and your family.


Source Article:
Parents investigated by child protective services after giving birth at home

"Natural birthing parents say they were harassed and forced to prove that the baby was put under government-approved medical supervision.

PHILADELPHIA, PA — A woman says that after delivering her baby naturally at home, she received multiple visits from social workers to her home requiring her to prove that her baby was healthy and under government-approved medical supervision.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Fatima Doumboya, 22, recently shared the story of her home-birth experience (in graphic detail) with a blog called Ms. Wright’s Way, and bluntly discussed her interactions with doctors, police, and social workers.

The birth itself went peacefully, she said, and for several days afterward, she and her husband stayed home with their new baby daughter. The couple feels some aversion to unnecessary medical interventions — part of the reason they chose to give birth at home — but reluctantly decided to visit a hospital for a checkup on Day #6.

The hospital experience, Doumboya wrote, was infuriating. When doctors found out they had performed a home-birth, she and her husband were allegedly treated as if they were “crazy” and “incompetent fools.”

While at St. Joseph’s Hospital ER in Philadelphia, after some brief checks, Doumboya says that doctors rudely told her that her baby would be transferred — without permission — to another hospital. The supposed reasoning was that St. Joseph’s did not have a dedicated pediatric center. The mom says the decision was made behind their backs and an ambulance was already dispatched by the time she was informed.

Even though nothing was found wrong with her baby, Doumboya says that rejecting the transfer was not an option. A staff member named Dr. Elisa Evans allegedly “came in the room with a stern look and said, ‘If you refuse to transfer her, we WILL CONTACT DHS AND THE POLICE,’” Doumboya recalled.

The mom says that cops appeared and blocked the exit. “The officers stood in front of the emergency room doors — arms crossed and said you cannot leave with your child.“

The baby was involuntarily transported by ambulance to Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (costing the parents $3,320.00). Doumboya says that doctors performed “test after test, hoping to find something.” For four hours this process went on, without the parents’ consent and under the threat of government compulsion. The parents had walked into St. Joseph’s at 10:00 a.m. and were not allowed to leave Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia until 9:30 p.m.

The harassment didn’t stop there. As Doumboya wrote at

The next morning, we get a ring at the door, Hubby and I already knew what it was.

“Hi my name is …. I am here because we received an alarm from the hospital about lack of supervision of your newborn”

HUH???!!??? I was at the top of the steps listening (she couldn’t see me) Hubby asked for her warrant lol, she informed us she didnt need one. They would be back EVERY SINGLE DAY until they were let in or would come with the cops.

After the third try, we knew we had nothing to hide so we let them in. Three different ladies came out.

Doumboya said that despite nothing being found wrong with the baby girl, the investigation process has been arduous.

“They called my baby’s physician to MAKE SURE we went to the doctor,” Doumboya wrote, “and now they are waiting for the doctors office to put it in writing that we did in fact take her and that she was healthy.”

Doumboya and her husband felt so violated by the ordeal that they have considered leaving the country to find somewhere where their parental rights will be respected. “The mere thought of them taking my child made me vomit and brought chills down my spine,” the violated mother wrote.

The practically boundless power of child welfare agencies to interject themselves into the lives of families introduces a frightening prospect for parents who make non-mainstream lifestyle choices; especially those that do not abide by the sanctioned methods of the medical complex."


Dear friends -- We are happy to announce that the release of our free book has been a big success! We want to let you know that the book has now been updated with some new and important information and we have made the process of downloading the book more streamlined in an effort to preserve anonymity.

We noticed that after our first announcement, thousands of people were coming to the website to check out the book, but some were choosing not to download it. We surmised that this is because we were requesting email addresses from people who would rather remain anonymous.

Because this information is so important, and because we really want you to have it, we have completely streamlined the process of downloading the book and no email information is required for you to obtain your free copy. Simply go to the website and click on the link and presto, you can read the entire book FOR FREE without divulging any personal information you would rather keep confidential.

You don't want to miss this folks! If you are one of the many people interested to understand the inner workings of the Illuminati and satanic ritual abuse, this book is a MUST-READ!!! Written by an adult survivor of satanic ritual abuse, the book provides details and insights into the sadistic, mean-spirited, worldwide cult known as the Illuminati and the methods they are using to attain control over our children, our minds, and our planet.

This book is being offered FOR FREE for a limited time only. Just follow this link for your FREE download.

Angelic Defenders & Demonic Abusers describes the experiences of a child forced into a pedophilic prostitution ring. It is told from the viewpoint of the survivor. The book provides insider information about the nature of international, organized Satanism.


Here are a few testimonials from our readers:
"I have read the entire book on satanism this night through, in one go. I could not stop reading. It was so well written and so easy to understand - it could not be done better, I am sure.

I cried on the last pages but not from sadness, but from empathy with all those people who work to help others and for the people trapped in this system, who don't really want to be there and I hope all this can end so we can all flourish and have better lives. I also understand that the satanists are not happy people and that one could feel sorry for them if they had not done so many horrific actions.

Thank you so much for the book, and I so hope that you will be successful and the author too will be successful. I really understand him and I think he is a very good person.

Best wishes,

"OMG this is an amazing book. Very well written and rings very authentic. Gonna recommend this one to many. Deserves the widest audience possible.
Thanks very much." -- Myles


This Thursday, June 12, 2014, at 2pm US eastern, please join me for this very important show...

SPECIAL EDITION: BIRTH TRAUMA--Satanism and Mind Control in medi-sin.

Jeanice Barcelo is a protector and defender of women, children, and families. She is an educator and birth activist, a TV and radio show host, and an outspoken leader in the movement to get birth out of the hospitals and back into the home. Jeanice views the ever-escalating amounts of trauma being inflicted on infants and birthing mothers as systematic, methodical, purposeful evil. Her work is dedicated to helping people see this and to awakening humanity to the keys to healing our condition -- which keys lie in transforming the way we conceive, gestate, birth, and parent our children.

To those with eyes to see, it has become clear that we are living in a culture of death, disease, and destruction. High-ranking, psychopathic, human-like entities have brought the entire ecosphere to the brink of annihilation. As a result, there is great danger to humanity and every single life form on this planet. We must either become aware of what, why, and who is causing this filth and degradation to life -- and take steps to eradicate and transform the evil -- or we will perish, and much of life will go with us.

During this radio broadcast, Jeanice will expose the forces that have pushed us to this place, and she will speak extensively about the dark side of modern medicine, especially as it concerns technologically-managed pregnancy and childbirth.

Jeanice will also talk about the keys to taking our power back through the conscious creation of life. In a culture where children are conceived as a side-effect of fleshy indulgence, and where haphazard conception is the norm, children are born spiritually stunted to parents who do not want them. As a result, millions and millions are suffering intensely. Unwanted babies carry lifelong imprints that convince them they are not lovable and will never be loved. Their traumatic womb experience is often followed by a traumatic birth, which is often followed by an inability to bond with their mother (and/or father), and an inability to attract and create authentic experiences of human love throughout life.

We are playing right into the hands of the dark forces when we conceive babies haphazardly and when we live in denial of the significance of what we are doing. We must act to correct our behavior now because our separation from Love is causing us to harm ourselves, our children, and all of Life.

We have the power to bring forth life in the most sacred and beautiful way. We have the power to conceive, gestate, and birth our babies IN LOVE and to bring forth children who can communicate with the Divine Mind and who will understand their true purpose for existing. This is the highest goal we can achieve and it is certainly one worth aspiring to.

Please join us for this most important interview. Thursday, June 12, 2pm eastern. Here is the link. Hope to see you there.


Circumcision is ritual sexual torture and genital mutilation of innocent babies. Anybody that can look at this picture and deny the obvious torture device that this baby has been placed into, combined with the obvious torture of having something shoved into his mouth so that he cannot scream while he is being sexually tortured and mutilated -- needs to have their head examined.

Circumcision permanently alters the brain due to extreme trauma. Moreover, it permanently alters male/female relationships.

What better way to control a population than to systematically torture and disempower the men and prevent them from properly bonding with women?

Circumcision is absolutely, unequivocally evil and it needs to end now. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Source Article:
Does Circumcision Cause Erectile Dysfunction?

The United States, a nation with 4.5% of the world's population, consumes 47% of the world's Viagra (Pfizer's own figures). Turns out the same nation has been circumcising the majority of its male infants for generations.

A new study in the International Journal of Men’s Health shows that circumcised men have a 4.5 times greater chance of suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED) than intact men, revealing what appears to be a significant acquisition vector. Other studies have previously observed that circumcision’s damage results in worsened erectile functioning, inability to maintain an erection, and reducing the glans sensitivity, including an overall penis sensitivity reduction by 75%. A recent study discovered that premature ejaculation is five times more likely when adjusted for erectile dysfunction and circumcision.

Moreover, in Israel- a country that routinely circumcises their baby boys for religious reasons- Viagra is so common there that the Pfizer pharmaceutical company asked for permission to market Viagra without a doctor's prescription- making it an over-the-counter medication.

The truth is, you simply cannot change form without altering function. While there are immediate dangers and harm caused by circumcision, there are also other problems that may not arise until much later in life. One of these dangers is erectile dysfunction (more commonly known as ED).

One of the major reasons that circumcision can lead to ED is because of keratinization. The glans (or head) of the penis is intended to be an internal organ, protected by the prepuce (foreskin). When the foreskin is removed, the head is completely exposed to the elements, including a constant rubbing against clothing. Over time, the skin thickens to protect the glans (much like a callous forms in areas of excessive friction). The head becomes dry and thick and is no longer supple and moist.

As men grow older, the thickened skin of the glans becomes less and less sensitive, which can cause men to have issues with erections. Sensitivity loss is also contributed to the circumcision itself, which removes the majority of the specialized nerve endings in the penis (over 20,000).

Below are some articles and books which address the issue of circumcision and ED:

Acquisition of Erectile Dysfunction from Circumcision

Does circumcision cause erectile dysfunction (ED)?

Is circumcision the reason we need Viagra?

Erectile Dysfunction Evaluation after Circumcision

What is keratinization?

Foreskin, Circumcision & Sexuality

A change in how intercourse works

Book: Sex As Nature Intended It

Book: The Rise of Viagra

Book: The Joy of Uncircumcising

How Male Circumcision May Be Affecting Your Love Life

Sexual side effects

From the Journal of Urology

Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis


This article is extremely annoying in that it never talks about the real reasons that women in the US are dying in such high numbers during childbirth. The real reason is simple. Hospital birth is incredibly violent. Women are dying because of abusive medical interventions and technological interference with the birth process. Industrialized birth has done nothing to make birth better and instead, is wreaking havoc on the lives of women, infants, and families.


Source Article By Andre Damon:
Maternal death in childbirth up 50 percent in America

"Mortality rate higher than China and Saudi Arabia

The incidence of maternal death in childbirth in the US has soared by 50 percent since 1990, according to an international study published Friday in the British medical journal Lancet.

The report found that, on average, 18.5 mothers died for every 100,000 live births in the US in 2013, more than double the maternal mortality rate in Saudi Arabia, at 7.0, and more than triple that in the United Kingdom, at 6.1.

This one statistic expresses in concentrated form the horrific decay of social infrastructure and the conditions of life for broad masses of people in the United States, in the course of a quarter century that has seen an immense increase in wealth at the very top of the economic ladder. There is a direct connection between the near-collapse of basic elements of civilized life and the obscene fortunes piled up by the financial parasites who dominate American society. That connection is lodged in the workings of the capitalist system itself.

The Lancet study findings point to the fact that, in what is called the “richest country in the world,” there exist levels of social deprivation comparable to, or worse than, what is to be found in “Third World” countries.

The US was one of only eight countries to see their rates of maternal mortality increase between 1990 and 2013. The others were Afghanistan, Greece, El Salvador, South Sudan and the tiny statelets of Belize, Guinea-Bissau and Seychelles.

Afghanistan was bombed, invaded and occupied by the US beginning in 2001, while South Sudan has been ravaged by ethnic fighting since its secession from Sudan in 2011. Greece has seen its economy shrink by nearly a third as a result of the 2008 crash and the austerity measures imposed at the behest of the International Monetary Fund and the European Union.

The study, entitled “Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013,” was conducted by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington.

“There’s no reason that a country with the resources and the medical expertise that the US has should see maternal deaths going up,” said Dr. Christopher Murray, Director of IHME.

The study found that the US has the 60th lowest material mortality rate, down from 22nd in 1990. Maternal mortality in the US was higher than that of Iran, with a rate of 13.5 per 100,000 live births, Kuwait, at 9.5, and Palestine, at 9.0, as well as China, at 17.2, and Russia, at 16.8.

The US is in an entirely different statistical category than the rest of the developed world. It has triple the rate of death in childbirth as Western Europe, which has a rate of 6.3 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births. While America’s rate of death in childbirth has shot up by 50 percent since 1990, the rate for Western Europe has been cut in half, from 12.7 in 1990. Germany has seen its maternal mortality rate fall from 18 in 1990 to 6.5 in 2013.

The incidence of death in childbirth in the US is even higher than the average of 17.6 deaths per 100,000 live births in Eastern Europe, ravaged by the restoration of capitalism following the breakup of the Soviet Union.

“For American women, high-risk pregnancies and the number of women with inadequate access to preventive and maternal health care are just two potential causes of this trend,” said Dr. Nicholas Kassebaum, one of the study’s authors.

The IHME said in a statement that the study’s authors attributed the high rate of maternal mortality in the US to “lack of access to prenatal care and other health services, high rates of caesarian section deliveries, and pregnancies complicated by obesity, diabetes, and other conditions.”

According to the World Health Organization, the incidence of maternal mortality expresses “inequities in access to health services, and highlights the gap between rich and poor.”

The enormous rise in maternal mortality has paralleled the growth of social inequality in the US. Since 1990, the top 0.1 percent of US income earners has more than doubled its share of the national wealth, while the share of the bottom 90 percent has plunged. The wealthiest 1 percent takes in a higher share of income in the United States than in any of the other 33 member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

The rise in economic inequality has paralleled the growth of hunger and poverty. The percentage of US households that are “food insecure” rose from 11.1 percent in 2007 to 16.0 percent in 2012. The poverty rate, meanwhile, has jumped from under 12 percent in 2000 to over 17.4 percent, according to figures reported by the OECD.

According to an OECD study released last year, US life expectancy in 2011 ranked below that of every Western European country, as well as Greece, Portugal, South Korea and Slovenia.

There is a direct correlation between the growth of social inequality and the decline in the rate of increase of life expectancy. A study published last month by the Brookings Institution found that the top 10 percent of male income earners in the US have a life expectancy ten years higher than that of the bottom 10 percent. The study’s author told the Atlantic magazine last month that, “where the [per-earner] income goes up by about $4,000, that was generally associated with living another year.”

The increase in maternal mortality in the US is bound up with the attack on the social position of the working class carried out by the ruling elite and its political representatives. Even as workers’ wages have stagnated and declined in the period covered by the survey, employers have cut health benefits for millions of workers.

During the period covered by the survey, successive presidencies and Congresses—Democratic and Republican alike—have slashed programs that benefit the most vulnerable sections of society while enabling the financial aristocracy to pile up even greater wealth.

This includes the ending of the federal welfare program and the complete deregulation of the financial markets during the Clinton Administration, Bush’s tax cuts for the rich, implemented with the support of the Democratic Party, and ruthless austerity measures enacted under Obama, including the cut-off of extended unemployment benefits, cuts in food stamps and home heating assistance, and sharp cuts in Medicare, Medicaid and retirement benefits.

The enormous social retrogression expressed in the maternal mortality figures directly poses political issues before the working class—the need to break with the two big business parties and build a mass socialist movement in opposition to the capitalist system."